Journal of medical microbiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8203 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 23 hours ago

Journal of medical microbiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Med Microbiol
Abbreviated Name j med microbiol
ISSN 1473-5644
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (38 total)

2014
The value of signs and symptoms in differentiating between bacterial, viral and mixed aetiology in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Huijskens EGW;Koopmans M;Palmen FMH;van Erkel AJM;Mulder PGH;Rossen JWA;;
Vol. 63 , No. Pt 3 , pp. -
516 views Abstract
1999
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae: bacteriology, epidemiology and clinical manifestations of an occupational pathogen
Brooke CJ;Riley TV;;
Vol. 48 , No. 9 , pp. -
452 views Abstract
2004
Autolysin-targeted LightCycler assay including internal process control for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA in clinical samples
Sheppard CL;Harrison TG;Morris R;Hogan A;George RC;;
Vol. 53 , No. Pt 3 , pp. -
400 views Abstract
2016
peningkatan pemahaman konsep dan hasil belajar materi penyesuaian makhluk hidup dalam pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think-pair-share dipadu dengan model picture and picture yang dikembangkan melalui lesson study
;Citra Marina
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 256-269
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida nivariensis from blood samples - an Iranian multicentre study and a review of the literature.
Arastehfar, Amir;Daneshnia, Farnaz;Salehi, Mohammad-Reza;Zarrinfar, Hossein;Khodavaisy, Sadegh;Haas, Pieter-Jan;Roudbary, Maryam;Najafzadeh, Mohammad-Javad;Zomorodian, Kamiar;Charsizadeh, Arezoo;Brouwer, Carlo;Pan, Weihua;Hagen, Ferry;Boekhout, Teun;
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 770-777
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Haitian-like genetic traits with creeping MIC of Azithromycin in O1 isolates from Puducherry, India.
Mohanraj, Regina Sumitha;Samanta, Prosenjit;Muhkopadhyay, Asish K;Mandal, Jharna;
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Detection and quantification of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in blood from infected chickens - addressing challenges with detection of DNA from infectious agents in host species with nucleated red blood cells.
Wattrang, Eva;Jäderblom, Victoria;Jinnerot, Tomas;Eriksson, Helena;Bagge, Elisabeth;Persson, Maria;Dalgaard, Tina Sørensen;Söderlund, Robert;
Vol. 68 , No. 7 , pp. 1003-1011
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
The application of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in pv. actinidiae.
Ho, Joycelyn;Zhao, Min;Wojcik, Samuel;Taiaroa, George;Butler, Margi;Poulter, Russell;
349 views DOI Abstract
1990
The rise and fall of Escherichia coli O15 in a London teaching hospital
O'Neill PM;Talboys CA;Roberts AP;Azadian BS;;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. -
344 views Abstract
2019
Evidence of hypervirulence in clonal complex 14.
Cardenas-Alvarez, Maria X;Townsend Ramsett, Megan K;Malekmohammadi, Sahar;Bergholz, Teresa M;
338 views DOI Abstract
View All 38 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.