Indexed in Journament

BMC psychiatry

ISSN 1471-244X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,758 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 80.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name BMC Psychiatry
Abbreviated Name bmc psychiatry
ISSN 1471-244X
URL https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for BMC psychiatry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.9 7.8
Content Distribution 65.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

2018
Risk and protective factors associated with the mental health of young adults in Kabul, Afghanistan
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
530 views Abstract
2019
Save the children by treating their mothers (PriVileG-M-study) - study protocol: a sequentially randomized controlled trial of individualized psychotherapy and telemedicine to reduce mental stress in pregnant women and young mothers and to improve Child's health.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 371
495 views DOI Abstract
2020
Gaps and challenges: WHO treatment recommendations for tobacco cessation and management of substance use disorders in people with severe mental illness.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 237
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serotonergic hallucinogens/psychedelics could be promising treatments for depressive and anxiety disorders in end-stage cancer.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 321
431 views DOI Abstract
2020
Helping people with psychosis to expand their social networks: the stakeholders' views.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 29
429 views DOI Abstract
2017
Prevalence and factors associated with depression among medical students in Cameroon: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 216
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-term psychological distress of Bosnian war survivors: an 11-year follow-up of former displaced persons, returnees, and stayers.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1
414 views DOI Abstract
2016
MindSurf: a pilot study to assess the usability and acceptability of a smartphone app designed to promote contentment, wellbeing, and goal achievement.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 442
414 views Abstract
2019
The characteristics and risk factors for common psychiatric disorders in patients with cancer seeking help for mental health.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 269
413 views DOI Abstract
2025
A controlled trial examining large Language model conformity in psychiatric assessment using the Asch paradigm.
Vol. 25 , pp. 478
90 views DOI Abstract
2025
Psychological and spiritual well-being of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in Ghana.
Vol. 25 , pp. 394
105 views DOI Abstract
2025
Sex-specific patterns in social visual attention among individuals with autistic traits.
Vol. 25 , pp. 440
104 views DOI Abstract
2022
Occupational burnout in Iranian health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
75 views Abstract
2020
Informing the personalisation of interventions for parents of children with conduct problems: a qualitative study.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 513
234 views DOI Abstract
2020
Females with ADHD: An expert consensus statement taking a lifespan approach providing guidance for the identification and treatment of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in girls and women
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-27
327 views Abstract
2020
Cognitive behavioural group therapy versus mindfulness-based stress reduction group therapy for intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 178-
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cognitive behavioural group therapy versus mindfulness-based stress reduction group therapy for intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
253 views DOI Abstract
2020
Gaps and challenges: WHO treatment recommendations for tobacco cessation and management of substance use disorders in people with severe mental illness.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 237
487 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,758 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.