forced migration review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3635 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 minggu yang lalu

forced migration review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
doaj
Nama Singkat forced migration review
Nama Singkatan forced migration review
ISSN
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2018
etiology and clinical characteristics of pediatric acute pancreatitis in saudi arabia: a 20-year experience from a single tertiary center
;Abdulrahman Alabdulkareem;Tameem Almahmoud;Husam Al-Tahan;Sundas Javad;Maher Al Hatlani
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 13-17
471 views DOI Abstract
2002
Childrens’ clubs: new ways of working with conflict-displaced children in Sri Lanka
Hart, Jason;
, No. 15 , pp. 36-39
374 views Abstract
2008
Seeking electoral equality for IDP voters
Grace, Jeremy;Fischer, Jeff;
, No. Special Issue: Ten Years of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement , pp. 26-27
369 views Abstract
2004
Sexual and reproductive health rights of Colombian IDPs
Sánchez, Carlos Iván Pacheco;Enríquez, Carolina;
, No. 19 , pp. 31-32
329 views Abstract
2010
Improving living conditions in Bossaso, Somalia
Decorte, Filiep;Tempra, Ombretta;
, No. 34 , pp. 16-18
302 views Abstract
2014
New OAS Conventions protecting IDPs against racism and discrimination
Nogueira, Maria Beatriz;
, No. 45 , pp. 81-81
290 views Abstract
2018
The role of livestock in refugee-host community relations
Hoots, Charles;
, No. 58 , pp. 71-74
286 views Abstract
2005
Land and the Sudanese transition to peace
Polloni, Domenico;
, No. 24 , pp. 21-22
272 views Abstract
2016
regional differences in the prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity among 13-year-old adolescents in greece
;Dimitrios Poulimeneas;Maria G. Grammatikopoulou;Leonidas Dimitrakopoulos;Emma Kotsias;Dina Gerothanasi;Efstratios R. Kiranas;Maria Tsigga
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 153-161
260 views DOI Abstract
2012
Supporting the social integration of trafficked young people
Cody, Claire;
, No. 40 , pp. 32-
252 views Abstract
View All 19 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.