the palgrave handbook of languages and conflict | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2121 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

the palgrave handbook of languages and conflict

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name the palgrave handbook of languages and conflict
Abbreviated Name the palgrave handbook of languages and conflict
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2016
risk factors for hearing impairment among adults with diabetes: the hispanic community health study/study of latinos (hchs/sol)
;Kathleen E. Bainbridge;Catherine C. Cowie;Franklyn Gonzalez II;Howard J. Hoffman;Elizabeth Dinces;Jeremiah Stamler;Karen J. Cruickshanks
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 15-22
381 views DOI Abstract
2016
ipragliflozin lowers small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
;Yukihiro Bando;Hitomi Tohyama;Keiko Aoki;Hideo Kanehara;Azusa Hisada;Kazuhiro Okafuji;Daisyu Toya
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 1-7
375 views DOI Abstract
2015
calcitriol treatment in metabolic bone disease of prematurity with elevated parathyroid hormone: a preliminary study
;Stacy E. Rustico;Andrea Kelly;Heather M. Monk;Andrew C. Calabria
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 14-20
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Who really wants to learn Arabic? On IDPs telem unit as an example of the continuation of the security discourse in Israeli field of Arabic in the 2000s
Mendel, Y.
, pp. 461-478
312 views DOI
2015
prevalence of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus in rural communities of guanajuato, mexico. effect after 6 months of telmisartan treatment
;Priscyla Zenteno-Castillo;Daniela Beatriz Muñoz-López;Benjamín Merino-Reyes;Ángel Vega-Sánchez;Monica Preciado-Puga;Ana Lilia González-Yebra;Carlos Kornhauser
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 125-128
240 views DOI Abstract
2015
additive effects of lupin protein and phytic acid on aortic calcification in apoe deficient mice
;Alexandra Schutkowski;Frank Hirche;Stefanie Geissler;Juliane Radtke;Gabriele I. Stangl
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 6-13
236 views DOI Abstract
2016
fear of hypoglycaemia and self-management in type 1 diabetes
;Aila J. Ahola;Markku Saraheimo;Riitta Freese;Sari Mäkimattila;Carol Forsblom;Per-Henrik Groop
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 13-18
222 views DOI Abstract
2019
The british in the second world war: Translation, language policies, and language practices
Footitt, H.
, pp. 373-393
211 views DOI
2017
dna methylation analysis in malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
;Toshihiro Oishi;Kazumi Iino;Yuta Okawa;Keisuke Kakizawa;Shoko Matsunari;Miho Yamashita;Terumi Taniguchi;Masato Maekawa;Takafumi Suda;Yutaka Oki
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 12-20
208 views DOI Abstract
2016
high dose vitamin d administration in ventilated intensive care unit patients: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial
;Jenny E. Han;Jennifer L. Jones;Vin Tangpricha;Mona A. Brown;Li Hao;Gautam Hebbar;Moon Jeong Lee;Shuling Liu;Lou Ann S. Brown;Thomas R. Ziegler;Greg S. Martin
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 59-65
202 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.