Indexed in Journament

Rehabilitation Communications

ISSN 2959-250X (Online), 2959-2496 (Print9· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,460 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
5 Articles
Scores higher than 47.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Rehabilitation Communications is a Biannual, peer-reviewed journal published online and in print, that publishes scholarly input from the scientific and wider community related to the important themes in rehabilitation sciences. The journal emphasizes studies integrating the wider interdisciplinary fields of rehabilitation sciences with hardcore evidenced based. The aim of Rehabilitation Communications is to provide a discussion platform for the rehabilitation community where healthy debate on important topics in rehabilitation sciences is possible. The journal hopes to bring basic scientists, clinicians, administrators, policymakers, and other stakeholders to one platform for the efficient utilization of physical, behavioral, and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for patients with physical and mental disabilities. Rehabilitation Communications primarily publishes original articles and reviews, however, case reports, short communications, special reports, and letters to the editor are also accepted.
Short Name Rehab Comm
Abbreviated Name RC
ISSN 2959-250X (Online), 2959-2496 (Print9
URL https://rootspress.org/journals/index.php/rehabilitation

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 37.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 87.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 37.5 25.7
Community Impact 4.3 5.8
Content Distribution 87.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (5)

2022
Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Traffic Police in Rawalpindi and Islamabad
Somiya Naz;Ambrin Kousar;Bakhtawar Aslam;Anum Matiullah;Saira Waqar;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 31-37
189 views DOI Abstract
2022
Prevalence of Neck Pain and Its Association With Computer Usage in the Academic Staff of the Private Universities of Peshawar
Muhammad Umar;Shah Fahad Ali;Akbar Ali;Umar Khitab;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 25-30
179 views DOI Abstract
2022
Effectiveness of Alexander Technique and Core Stability Exercises Versus McKenzie Method in the Treatment of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: A Randomized Control Trial
Muhammad Suleman Sikander;Muhammad Waqas Khan;Muhammad Akmal;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 07-13
163 views DOI Abstract
2022
Frequency of the Low Back Pain in Security Guards of Bus Rapid Transit System Peshawar
Muhammad Suleman Sikander;Aftab Ahmed Khan;Salman Khan;Muhammad Ismail;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 39-42
129 views DOI Abstract
2022
Lower Back Pain and Disability in Undergraduate Medical Students
Ambrin Kousar;Somiya Naz;Bakhtawar Aslam;Javerai Zahid;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 15-24
123 views DOI Abstract
2022
Frequency of the Low Back Pain in Security Guards of Bus Rapid Transit System Peshawar
Muhammad Suleman Sikander;Aftab Ahmed Khan;Salman Khan;Muhammad Ismail;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 39-42
129 views DOI Abstract
2022
Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Traffic Police in Rawalpindi and Islamabad
Somiya Naz;Ambrin Kousar;Bakhtawar Aslam;Anum Matiullah;Saira Waqar;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 31-37
189 views DOI Abstract
2022
Prevalence of Neck Pain and Its Association With Computer Usage in the Academic Staff of the Private Universities of Peshawar
Muhammad Umar;Shah Fahad Ali;Akbar Ali;Umar Khitab;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 25-30
179 views DOI Abstract
2022
Lower Back Pain and Disability in Undergraduate Medical Students
Ambrin Kousar;Somiya Naz;Bakhtawar Aslam;Javerai Zahid;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 15-24
123 views DOI Abstract
2022
Effectiveness of Alexander Technique and Core Stability Exercises Versus McKenzie Method in the Treatment of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: A Randomized Control Trial
Muhammad Suleman Sikander;Muhammad Waqas Khan;Muhammad Akmal;
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 07-13
163 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,460 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

37.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

87.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.