Developmental psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3755 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Developmental psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Dev Psychol
Abbreviated Name dev psychol
ISSN 1939-0599
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.apa.org/journals/dev
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2006
Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations.
Jennifer A. Fredricks; Jacquelynne S. Eccles
858 views DOI
2019
Culture-specific development of early mother-infant emotional co-regulation: Italian, Cameroonian, and West African immigrant dyads.
Lavelli, Manuela;Carra, Cecilia;Rossi, Germano;Keller, Heidi;
Vol. 55 , No. 9 , pp. 1850-1867
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
A longitudinal study of link between exposure to violent video games and aggression in Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of moral disengagement.
Teng, Zhaojun;Nie, Qian;Guo, Cheng;Zhang, Qian;Liu, Yanling;Bushman, Brad J;
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 184-195
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analyzing the developmental relation of academic self-concept and achievement in elementary school children: Alternative models point to different results.
Ehm, Jan-Henning;Hasselhorn, Marcus;Schmiedek, Florian;
402 views DOI Abstract
2014
Parent relationship quality buffers against the effect of peer stressors on depressive symptoms from middle childhood to adolescence.
Hazel, Nicholas A;Oppenheimer, Caroline W;Technow, Jessica R;Young, Jami F;Hankin, Benjamin L;
Vol. 50 , No. 8 , pp. 2115-23
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Driven by context? The interrelated effects of parents, peers, classrooms on development of prejudice among Swedish majority adolescents.
Miklikowska, Marta;Bohman, Andrea;Titzmann, Peter F;
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
The future of emotion regulation research is in how we measure the dynamics of change.
Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A;
Vol. 55 , No. 9 , pp. 2006-2008
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Emotion-related socialization in the classroom: Considering the roles of teachers, peers, and the classroom context.
Valiente, Carlos;Swanson, Jodi;DeLay, Dawn;Fraser, Ashley M;Parker, Julia H;
Vol. 56 , No. 3 , pp. 578-594
324 views DOI Abstract
2018
Violent video games, externalizing behavior, and prosocial behavior: A five-year longitudinal study during adolescence.
Coyne, Sarah M;Warburton, Wayne A;Essig, Lee W;Stockdale, Laura A;
Vol. 54 , No. 10 , pp. 1868-1880
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
The promises and perils of automated facial action coding in studying children's emotions.
Martinez, Aleix M;
Vol. 55 , No. 9 , pp. 1965-1981
313 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.