scandinavian journal of work, environment & health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1150 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

scandinavian journal of work, environment & health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name scand j work environ health
Abbreviated Name scand j work environ health
ISSN 1795-990X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.sjweh.fi
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2018
Prolonged sitting at work is associated with a favorable time course of low-back pain among blue-collar workers: a prospective study in the DPhacto cohort.
Korshøj, Mette;Jørgensen, Marie Birk;Hallman, David M;Lagersted-Olsen, Julie;Holtermann, Andreas;Gupta, Nidhi;
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 530-538
446 views DOI Abstract
2016
The effect of motherhood and work on women's time pressure: A cohort analysis using the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.
Otterbach, Steffen;Tavener, Meredith;Forder, Peta;Powers, Jennifer;Loxton, Deborah;Byles, Julie;
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 500-509
416 views DOI Abstract
2018
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
Colombini, Daniela;Occhipinti, Enrico;
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 436-438
412 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of training for a participatory ergonomic intervention on physical exertion and musculoskeletal pain among childcare workers (the TOY project) - a wait-list cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Rasmussen, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard;Sørensen, Ole Henning;Allard J, Allard J;Holtermann, Andreas;
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Public health and evidence-informed policy-making: The case of a commonly used herbicide.
Vainio, Harri;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 105-109
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
rainfall risk and the potential of reduced tillage systems to conserve soil water in semi-arid cropping systems of southern africa
;P. Munguambe;S. Walker;M. Magombeyi;E. Masvaya;W. Mupangwa
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 85-101
353 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of agro-industry by-product on soil fertility, tree performances and fruit quality in pear (<em>pyrus communis </em>l.)
;Maurizio Quartieri;Elena Baldi;Giovambattista Sorrenti;Graziella Marcolini;Moreno Toselli
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 20-32
315 views DOI Abstract
2016
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.
Fleuren, Bram Bi;de Grip, Andries;Jansen, Nicole Wh;Kant, Imjert;Zijlstra, Fred Rh;
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 557-560
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public health and evidence-informed policy-making: The case of a commonly used herbicide.
Vainio, Harri;
267 views DOI Abstract
2017
a simple low-cost method of determining whether it is safe to store maize
;Tim Tubbs;Charles Woloshuk;Klein E. Ileleji
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 43-55
263 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.