Indexed in Journament

Phytopharmacological Communications

ISSN 2958-5856 (Online), 2958-5848 (Print)· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,836 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 59.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Phytopharmacological Communications is a biannual, peer-reviewed journal published online and in print, that includes studies investigating the use of plants and their biological and pharmacological effects based on the principles of skeptical inquiry and the scientific method. Key areas of interest are pharmacology, toxicology, and the clinical applications of herbs and natural products in medicine, including studies of herb-drug interactions and other aspects of the safety of herbal medicines. Papers concerned with the effects of common food ingredients and standardized plant extracts, including commercial products, are particularly welcome, as are mechanistic studies on isolated natural phytocompounds.
Short Name Phyto Pharm Comm
Abbreviated Name PPC
ISSN 2958-5856 (Online), 2958-5848 (Print)
URL https://rootspress.org/journals/index.php/ppc/index
Author Instructions https://rootspress.org/journals/index.php/PPC/about/submissions#authorGuidelines

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 0.7
Content Distribution 67.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Phytopharmacological Communications
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 0.7 5.8
Content Distribution 67.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2022
Investigation of the Diuretic Potential of Diosmetin, a Flavonoid from Citrus lemon in Sprague-Dawley Rat Model
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 115-126
249 views DOI Abstract
2022
Medicinal Plants with Spasmolytic Activity for Treating Colic
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 159-175
234 views DOI Abstract
2022
Search for the Natural Remedies for the Treatment of Gout
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 193-204
203 views DOI Abstract
2022
Chemomodulatory Potential of n-Hexane Extract of Conyza bonariensis Against Skin Carcinogenesis in Mice Induced by Carcinogens: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 145-158
185 views DOI Abstract
2022
Scientific Rationalization of the Traditional Uses of Medicinal Plants
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 103-103
159 views DOI Abstract
2022
Antispasmodic and Antidiarrheal Effect of Hippeastrum puniceum; Involvement of Antimuscarinic and Calcium Antagonism Pathways
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 127-143
150 views DOI Abstract
2022
Inula Japonica Alleviates Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 109-113
149 views DOI Abstract
2022
Neuroprotection in Aβ25-35 -Induced Alzheimer's Disease Model by Hawthorn Leaf Flavonoids
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 109-113
141 views DOI Abstract
2022
Cannabis Sativa L. Extract Improves Neuroprotection in a Model of Excitotoxicity
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 109-113
122 views DOI Abstract
2022
Search for the Natural Remedies for the Treatment of Gout
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 193-204
203 views DOI Abstract
2022
Natural Remedies for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 177-192
115 views DOI Abstract
2022
Medicinal Plants with Spasmolytic Activity for Treating Colic
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 159-175
234 views DOI Abstract
2022
Chemomodulatory Potential of n-Hexane Extract of Conyza bonariensis Against Skin Carcinogenesis in Mice Induced by Carcinogens: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 145-158
185 views DOI Abstract
2022
Antispasmodic and Antidiarrheal Effect of Hippeastrum puniceum; Involvement of Antimuscarinic and Calcium Antagonism Pathways
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 127-143
150 views DOI Abstract
2022
Investigation of the Diuretic Potential of Diosmetin, a Flavonoid from Citrus lemon in Sprague-Dawley Rat Model
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 115-126
249 views DOI Abstract
2022
Cannabis Sativa L. Extract Improves Neuroprotection in a Model of Excitotoxicity
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 109-113
122 views DOI Abstract
2022
A Chinese Decoction Arrests Lung Cancer
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 109-113
67 views DOI Abstract
2022
Inula Japonica Alleviates Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 109-113
149 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,836 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.