Indexed in Journament

Midwifery

ISSN 1532-3099· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,105 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
48 Articles
Scores higher than 85.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Midwifery
Abbreviated Name midwifery
ISSN 1532-3099
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/midwifery

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 61.1 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.2
Content Distribution 61.0 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2019
Health care providers' perception of facilitators and barriers for the practice of skin-to-skin contact in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.
Abdulghani, Nawal;Edvardsson, Kristina;Amir, Lisa H;
Vol. 81 , pp. 102577
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Knowledge and use of the ICM global standards for midwifery education.
Barger, Mary K;Hackley, Barbara;Bharj, Kuldip K;Luyben, Ans;Thompson, Joyce B;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102534
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nomads' perceptions of quality, accessibility, and affordability of health services as determinants of using skilled birth attendants in Gossi, Mali.
Ag Ahmed, Mohamed Ali;Hamelin-Brabant, Louise;Gagnon, Marie-Pierre;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102556
464 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study.
Gidaszewski, Beata;Khajehei, Marjan;Gibbs, Emma;Chua, Seng Chai;
Vol. 69 , pp. 10-16
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Referral linkage among public health facilities in Ethiopia: A qualitative explanatory study of facilitators and barriers for emergency obstetric referral in Addis Ababa city administration
Yasin, C.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
436 views DOI
2018
Financial decision making power is associated with moderate to severe anemia: A prospective cohort study among pregnant women in rural South India.
Krupp, Karl;Placek, Caitlyn D;Wilcox, Meredith;Ravi, Kavitha;Srinivas, Vijaya;Arun, Anjali;Madhivanan, Purnima;
Vol. 61 , pp. 15-21
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.
Fobelets, Maaike;Beeckman, Katrien;Buyl, Ronald;Healy, Patricia;Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne;Nicoletti, Jane;Canepa, Matilde;Devane, Declan;Gross, Mechthild M;Morano, Sandra;Daly, Deirdre;Begley, Cecily;Putman, Koen;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102536
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
Women's lived experience of compassionate midwifery: Human and professional.
Menage, Diane;Bailey, Elizabeth;Lees, Susan;Coad, Jane;
Vol. 85 , pp. 102662
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Women's successful transition to motherhood during the early postnatal period: A qualitative systematic review of postnatal and midwifery home care literature.
Walker, Sandra B;Rossi, Dolene M;Sander, Teresa M;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102552
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Couples' prenatal bonding to the fetus and the association with one's own and partner's emotional well-being and adult romantic attachment style.
Göbel, Ariane;Barkmann, Claus;Arck, Petra;Hecher, Kurt;Schulte-Markwort, Michael;Diemert, Anke;Mudra, Susanne;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102549
398 views DOI Abstract
2021
Maternal perception of paternal breastfeeding support: A secondary qualitative analysis
Srisopa, Pornpan; Lucas, Ruth
Vol. 102 , pp. 103067
145 views DOI
2020
o olhar de adolescentes grávidas no ritual de passagem menina-mãe
;Carmen Aparecida Cardoso Maia Camargo;Marcio Antonio Ferreira Camargo;Jaciara Aurora de Oliveira;Bianca Rodrigues de Paulo
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 74-94
117 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effectiveness of massage for reducing pregnant women's anxiety and depression; systematic review and meta-analysis
Hall HG;Cant R;Munk N;Carr B;Tremayne A;Weller C;Fogarty S;Lauche R;;
Vol. 90 , pp. -
155 views Abstract
2020
Effects of a health education program targeted to Chinese women adhering to their cultural practice of doing the month: A randomized controlled trial
Liu Y;Hu J;Chen X;Yu Y;Bai J;;
Vol. 90 , pp. -
198 views Abstract
2020
Assessing mental health during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study of midwives' perceptions.
Baker, Natasha;Gillman, Lindsay;Coxon, Kirstie;
Vol. 86 , pp. 102690
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
The impact of human trafficking in relation to maternity care: A literature review.
Collins, Catherine;Skarparis, Katy;
Vol. 83 , pp. 102645
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Women's lived experience of compassionate midwifery: Human and professional.
Menage, Diane;Bailey, Elizabeth;Lees, Susan;Coad, Jane;
Vol. 85 , pp. 102662
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Benchmarking outcomes in maternity care: Peripartum incontinence - a framework for standardised reporting.
Slavin, Valerie;Creedy, Debra K;Gamble, Jenny;
Vol. 83 , pp. 102628
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Why do community members believe mothers and babies dying? Behavioral versus situational attribution in rural northern Ghana.
Aboungo, Victoria;Kaselitz, Elizabeth;Aborigo, Raymond;Williams, John;James, Kat;Moyer, Cheryl;
Vol. 83 , pp. 102657
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
The role and outcomes of music listening for women in childbirth: An integrative review.
McCaffrey, Tríona;Cheung, Pui Sze;Barry, Maebh;Punch, Pattie;Dore, Liz;
Vol. 83 , pp. 102627
375 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,105 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.