Midwifery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5863 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Midwifery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Midwifery
Abbreviated Name midwifery
ISSN 1532-3099
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/midwifery
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (48 total)

2019
Knowledge and use of the ICM global standards for midwifery education.
Barger, Mary K;Hackley, Barbara;Bharj, Kuldip K;Luyben, Ans;Thompson, Joyce B;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102534
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nomads' perceptions of quality, accessibility, and affordability of health services as determinants of using skilled birth attendants in Gossi, Mali.
Ag Ahmed, Mohamed Ali;Hamelin-Brabant, Louise;Gagnon, Marie-Pierre;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102556
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health care providers' perception of facilitators and barriers for the practice of skin-to-skin contact in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.
Abdulghani, Nawal;Edvardsson, Kristina;Amir, Lisa H;
Vol. 81 , pp. 102577
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Referral linkage among public health facilities in Ethiopia: A qualitative explanatory study of facilitators and barriers for emergency obstetric referral in Addis Ababa city administration
Yasin, C.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
373 views DOI
2019
Women's successful transition to motherhood during the early postnatal period: A qualitative systematic review of postnatal and midwifery home care literature.
Walker, Sandra B;Rossi, Dolene M;Sander, Teresa M;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102552
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study.
Gidaszewski, Beata;Khajehei, Marjan;Gibbs, Emma;Chua, Seng Chai;
Vol. 69 , pp. 10-16
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Women's lived experience of compassionate midwifery: Human and professional.
Menage, Diane;Bailey, Elizabeth;Lees, Susan;Coad, Jane;
Vol. 85 , pp. 102662
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
Financial decision making power is associated with moderate to severe anemia: A prospective cohort study among pregnant women in rural South India.
Krupp, Karl;Placek, Caitlyn D;Wilcox, Meredith;Ravi, Kavitha;Srinivas, Vijaya;Arun, Anjali;Madhivanan, Purnima;
Vol. 61 , pp. 15-21
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.
Fobelets, Maaike;Beeckman, Katrien;Buyl, Ronald;Healy, Patricia;Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne;Nicoletti, Jane;Canepa, Matilde;Devane, Declan;Gross, Mechthild M;Morano, Sandra;Daly, Deirdre;Begley, Cecily;Putman, Koen;
Vol. 79 , pp. 102536
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Humanitarian migrant women's experiences of maternity care in Nordic countries: A systematic integrative review of qualitative research
Leppälä, S.
Vol. 80 , pp. 102572
357 views DOI
View All 48 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.