Indexed in Journament

World of Science: Journal on Modern Research Methodologies

ISSN 2835-3072· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,419 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
6 Articles
Scores higher than 37.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

World of Science: Journal on Modern Research Methodologies (U.S. ISSN 2835-3072) is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad scope that aims to publish the most recent global research. World of Science: Journal on Modern Research Methodologies is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad scope that aims to publish the most recent global research to make significant contributions to applied research and knowledge by publishing original, high-quality research articles in Medicine, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dentistry, Physical Therapy, Veterinary Medicine, Basic and Biological Sciences such as biology, molecular biology, biotechnology, chemistry, physics, biophysics, geology, astronomy, biophysics and environmental science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Computer Sciences and Agricultural Science.
Short Name World of Science
Abbreviated Name WoSJMRM
ISSN 2835-3072
URL https://univerpubl.com/index.php/woscience
Author Instructions https://univerpubl.com/index.php/woscience/information/authors

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 54.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 71.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 54.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.9 13.4
Content Distribution 71.9 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (6)

2022
Competencies and Values of Barangay Nutrition Scholars in Eastern Visayas: Basis for Program Development
Nino Archie S. Labordo;
Vol. 1 , pp. 23-32
360 views DOI Abstract
2022
Developing Consumer Information on Proper use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Rehan Haider Geetha Das;Rehan Haider Geetha Das;
Vol. 1 , pp. 48-55
315 views DOI Abstract
2022
Covid-19 Resilience: A Review
Amos Danladi;Haruna Ahmadu;Maimuna Aboki;Zainab Mohammed Zakari;Haleema Ja’afar;Kevin Bako Koza;Nuhu Abdullahi;Kauthar Abubakar Mikail;Micheal Silas Dadai;Zainab Muhammed Dalhatu;Solomon Dembo;Yahaya Abdullahi;Gabriel Ling Hoh Teck;Modi Sule Zango;Abdullahi Sadauki;Solomon Zakka Dyachia;Isa Abdullahi;Hassan Muhammad;
Vol. 1 , pp. 33-41
214 views DOI Abstract
2022
Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectroscopy of Juniperus Phoenice Stem Bark Extract and Its Influence on the Haemato-Biochemical Values of Growing Rabbits
Alagbe, J.O;
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-14
212 views DOI Abstract
2022
Ways to Strengthen the Theoretical Knowledge of High School Students through Computer Technology
Qobiljon Toshtemirov;
Vol. 1 , pp. 42-47
135 views DOI Abstract
2022
An Islamic Cum Hindu Approach to Inter-Religious Dialogue
Muneeb Ahmad;
Vol. 1 , pp. 15-22
123 views DOI Abstract
2022
Developing Consumer Information on Proper use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Rehan Haider Geetha Das;Rehan Haider Geetha Das;
Vol. 1 , pp. 48-55
315 views DOI Abstract
2022
Ways to Strengthen the Theoretical Knowledge of High School Students through Computer Technology
Qobiljon Toshtemirov;
Vol. 1 , pp. 42-47
135 views DOI Abstract
2022
Covid-19 Resilience: A Review
Amos Danladi;Haruna Ahmadu;Maimuna Aboki;Zainab Mohammed Zakari;Haleema Ja’afar;Kevin Bako Koza;Nuhu Abdullahi;Kauthar Abubakar Mikail;Micheal Silas Dadai;Zainab Muhammed Dalhatu;Solomon Dembo;Yahaya Abdullahi;Gabriel Ling Hoh Teck;Modi Sule Zango;Abdullahi Sadauki;Solomon Zakka Dyachia;Isa Abdullahi;Hassan Muhammad;
Vol. 1 , pp. 33-41
214 views DOI Abstract
2022
Competencies and Values of Barangay Nutrition Scholars in Eastern Visayas: Basis for Program Development
Nino Archie S. Labordo;
Vol. 1 , pp. 23-32
360 views DOI Abstract
2022
An Islamic Cum Hindu Approach to Inter-Religious Dialogue
Muneeb Ahmad;
Vol. 1 , pp. 15-22
123 views DOI Abstract
2022
Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectroscopy of Juniperus Phoenice Stem Bark Extract and Its Influence on the Haemato-Biochemical Values of Growing Rabbits
Alagbe, J.O;
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-14
212 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,419 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.