BMC Bioinformatics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2450 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 23 hours ago

BMC Bioinformatics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name BMC Bioinformatics
Abbreviated Name bmc bioinformatics
ISSN 1471-2105
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcbioinformatics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (635 total)

2006
Machine learning techniques in disease forecasting: a case study on rice blast prediction
S, Kapoor Amar;Rakesh, Kaundal;PS, Raghava Gajendra;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 485-
726 views Abstract
2012
EVA: Exome Variation Analyzer, an efficient and versatile tool for filtering strategies in medical genomics
Sophie, Coutant;Chloé, Cabot;Arnaud, Lefebvre;Martine, Léonard;Elise, Prieur-Gaston;Dominique, Campion;Thierry, Lecroq;Hélène, Dauchel;
Vol. 13 , No. Suppl 14 , pp. S9-
606 views Abstract
2014
Characterization and identification of protein O-GlcNAcylation sites with substrate specificity.
Wu, Hsin-Yi;Lu, Cheng-Tsung;Kao, Hui-Ju;Chen, Yi-Ju;Chen, Yu-Ju;Lee, Tzong-Yi;
Vol. 15 Suppl 16 , pp. S1
592 views DOI Abstract
2018
Automated shape-based clustering of 3D immunoglobulin protein structures in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Polychronidou, Eleftheria;Kalamaras, Ilias;Agathangelidis, Andreas;Sutton, Lesley-Ann;Yan, Xiao-Jie;Bikos, Vasilis;Vardi, Anna;Mochament, Konstantinos;Chiorazzi, Nicholas;Belessi, Chrysoula;Rosenquist, Richard;Ghia, Paolo;Stamatopoulos, Kostas;Vlamos, Panayiotis;Chailyan, Anna;Overby, Nanna;Marcatili, Paolo;Hatzidimitriou, Anastasia;Tzovaras, Dimitrios;
Vol. 19 , No. S14 , pp. 67-81
581 views Abstract
2010
SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data
Murray P Cox;Daniel A Peterson;Patrick J Biggs;Murray P Cox;Daniel A Peterson;Patrick J Biggs;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
562 views DOI Abstract
2019
Jaccard/Tanimoto similarity test and estimation methods for biological presence-absence data.
Chung, Neo Christopher;Miasojedow, BłaŻej;Startek, Michał;Gambin, Anna;
Vol. 20 , No. Suppl 15 , pp. 644
547 views DOI Abstract
2012
NetiNeti: discovery of scientific names from text using machine learning methods
Lakshmi, Akella;N, Norton Catherine;Holly, Miller;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 211-
508 views Abstract
2019
Linking entities through an ontology using word embeddings and syntactic re-ranking.
Karadeniz, İlknur;Özgür, Arzucan;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 156
488 views DOI Abstract
2011
Acorn: A grid computing system for constraint based modeling and visualization of the genome scale metabolic reaction networks via a web interface
E, Bushell Michael;Claudio, Avignone-Rossa;Mateusz, Markowski;Jakub, Łącki;Dariusz, Leniowski;Szymon, Gwóźdź;Łukasz, Bieniasz-Krzywiec;Jacek, Sroka;Johnjoe, McFadden;M, Kierzek Andrzej;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 196-
474 views Abstract
2010
PostMod: sequence based prediction of kinase-specific phosphorylation sites with indirect relationship.
Jung, Inkyung;Matsuyama, Akihisa;Yoshida, Minoru;Kim, Dongsup;
Vol. 11 Suppl 1 , pp. S10
466 views DOI Abstract
View All 635 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
100
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.