Indexed in Journament

international journal of clinical oncology

ISSN 1437-7772· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,039 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 38.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int j clin oncol
Abbreviated Name international journal of clinical oncology
ISSN 1437-7772
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10147

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of clinical oncology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 26.3
Innovation 61.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.6
Content Distribution 71.1 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2014
salivary concentration of the antimicrobial peptide ll-37 in patients with oral lichen planus
Vol. 6 , pp. 1-6
541 views DOI Abstract
2010
analysis of microbiota associated with peri-implantitis using 16s rrna gene clone library
Vol. 2 , pp. 1-7
484 views DOI Abstract
2019
Weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: a single-arm phase II study.
420 views DOI Abstract
2015
acidogenicity and acidurance of dental plaque and saliva sediment from adults in relation to caries activity and chlorhexidine exposure
Vol. 7 , pp. 1-6
404 views DOI Abstract
2014
children with severe early childhood caries: streptococci genetic strains within carious and white spot lesions
Vol. 6 , pp. 1-11
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer occurs early during follow-up of endometrial cysts.
368 views DOI Abstract
2015
polymorphisms in the interleukin-10 gene and chronic periodontitis in patients with atherosclerotic and aortic aneurysmal vascular diseases
Vol. 7 , pp. 1-8
355 views DOI Abstract
2015
bacteriophage and their potential roles in the human oral cavity
Vol. 7 , pp. 1-12
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: a single-arm phase II study.
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer occurs early during follow-up of endometrial cysts.
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of histologic variants on the oncological outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract cancers treated with radical surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study.
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
oral microbiota species in acute apical endodontic abscesses
Vol. 8 , pp. 1-9
269 views DOI Abstract
2016
phage therapy against enterococcus faecalis in dental root canals
Vol. 8 , pp. 1-11
260 views DOI Abstract
2015
the commensal microbiota and the development of human disease – an introduction
Vol. 7 , pp. 1-1
164 views DOI Abstract
2015
bacteriophage and their potential roles in the human oral cavity
Vol. 7 , pp. 1-12
346 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,039 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.