seminars in radiation oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#510 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

seminars in radiation oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name semin radiat oncol
Abbreviated Name seminars in radiation oncology
ISSN 1532-9461
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/seminars-in-radiation-oncology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2019
Big Data in Cancer Research: Real-World Resources for Precision Oncology to Improve Cancer Care Delivery
Tsai, C.
Vol. 29 , pp. 306-310
347 views DOI
2016
influence of in utero maternal and neonate factors on cord blood leukocyte telomere length: clues to the racial disparity in prostate cancer?
;Kari A. Weber;Christopher M. Heaphy;Sabine Rohrmann;Beverly Gonzalez;Jessica L. Bienstock;Tanya Agurs-Collins;Elizabeth A. Platz;Alan K. Meeker
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
326 views DOI Abstract
2014
evidence suggesting that obesity prevention measures may improve prostate cancer outcomes using data from a prospective randomized trial
;Ravi A. Chandra;Ming-Hui Chen;Danjie Zhang;Marian Loffredo;Anthony V. D’Amico
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing Treatment-Related Toxicity Using Administrative Data, Patient-Reported Outcomes, or Physician-Graded Toxicity: Where Is the Truth?
Gross, Michael D;Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Bashir;Hu, Jim C;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 333-337
266 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficacy of abiraterone and enzalutamide in pre- and postdocetaxel castration-resistant prostate cancer: a trial-level meta-analysis
;Mike Fang;Mary Nakazawa;Emmanuel S. Antonarakis;Chun Li
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Evolving Use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) for Research.
Kim, Ellen;Rubinstein, Samuel M;Nead, Kevin T;Wojcieszynski, Andrzej P;Gabriel, Peter E;Warner, Jeremy L;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 354-361
251 views DOI Abstract
2011
bevacizumab and weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer previously exposed to docetaxel
;Filippo Francini;Alessandra Pascucci;Edoardo Francini;Gianluca Bargagli;Raffaele Conca;Antonella Licchetta;Giandomenico Roviello;Ignazio Martellucci;Giorgio Chiriacò;Salvatora Tindara Miano;Giuseppe Marzocca;Antonio Manganelli;Roberto Ponchietti;Vinno Savelli;Roberto Petrioli
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
250 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Claims Data for Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Research.
Shih, Ya-Chen Tina;Liu, Lei;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 348-353
248 views DOI Abstract
2011
contemporary radical prostatectomy
;Qiang Fu;Judd W. Moul;Leon Sun
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
2013
blood level omega-3 fatty acids as risk determinant molecular biomarker for prostate cancer
;Mishell Kris Sorongon-Legaspi;Michael Chua;Maria Christina Sio;Marcelino Morales
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
229 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.