journal der deutschen dermatologischen gesellschaft = journal of the german society of dermatology : jddg | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5864 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 เดือนที่แล้ว

journal der deutschen dermatologischen gesellschaft = journal of the german society of dermatology : jddg

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
การจัดทำดัชนี
ncbi
ชื่อย่อ j dtsch dermatol ges
ชื่อตัวย่อ j dtsch dermatol ges
ISSN 1610-0387
วัตถุประสงค์และขอบเขต
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/16100387
คำแนะนำสำหรับผู้เขียน

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2019
Immunohistochemical analysis of Bcl-2, nuclear S100A4, MITF and Ki67 for risk stratification of early-stage melanoma - A combined IHC score for melanoma risk stratification.
Jurmeister, Philipp;Bockmayr, Michael;Treese, Christoph;Stein, Ulrike;Lenze, Dido;Jöhrens, Korinna;Friedling, Franziska;Dietel, Manfred;Klauschen, Frederick;Marsch, Wolfgang;Fiedler, Eckhard;von Laffert, Maximilian;
Vol. 17 , No. 8 , pp. 800-808
394 views DOI Abstract
2018
Kurzfristige Wirksamkeit von Adalimumab bei einer Patientin mit pyrinassoziierter autoinflammatorischer Erkrankung mit neutrophiler Dermatose.
Gargallo, Vanessa;Menis, Diana;Delgado Márquez, Ana María;Aróstegui, Juan Ignacio;Llamas Martín, Rafael;
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 756-759
382 views DOI
2019
Die Wirksamkeit der Radiofrequenztherapie mit isolierten Mikronadeln zur Reduktion von hervortretenden infraorbitalen Fettpolstern.
Shin, Jung-Won;Park, Jung-Tae;Chae, Je-Byeong;Choi, Ji-Young;Na, Jung-Im;Park, Kyoung-Chan;Huh, Chang-Hun;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 149-157
356 views DOI
2018
Vertikale Übertragung des Herpes-simplex-Virus: eine Aktualisierung.
Bhatta, Anil Kumar;Keyal, Uma;Liu, Yeqiang;Gellen, Emese;
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 685-693
353 views DOI Abstract
2018
Die Wirksamkeit einer neuen Nagelspange für die Behandlung von eingewachsenen Nägeln.
Liu, Che-Wei;Huang, Yu-Chen;
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 417-425
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Wirksamkeit des IL-17-Hemmers SECUKINUMAB bei akuter generalisierter exanthematische Pustulose (AGEP).
Gualtieri, Bruno;Möbs, Christian;Solimani, Farzan;Hertl, Michael;Pfützner, Wolfgang;
Vol. 17 Suppl 2 , pp. 22-24
352 views DOI
2018
Wirksamkeit einer ablationsbasierten Kombinationstherapie bei Vitiligo: Eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Metaanalyse.
King, Yih-An;Tsai, Tsung-Yu;Tsai, Hsiou-Hsin;Huang, Yu-Chen;
Vol. 16 , No. 10 , pp. 1197-1210
333 views DOI
2018
Einfluss von Rot- versus Blaulicht auf Verträglichkeit und Wirksamkeit der PDT: eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie.
Gholam, Patrick;Bosselmann, Ina;Enk, Alexander;Fink, Christine;
Vol. 16 , No. 6 , pp. 711-718
326 views DOI
2017
Behandlungspräferenzen für Biologika bei Psoriasis: erfahrene Patienten legen Wert auf Nachhaltigkeit.
Kromer, Christian;Peitsch, Wiebke K;Herr, Raphael;Schmieder, Astrid;Sonntag, Diana;Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 189-201
314 views DOI Abstract
2015
New systemic agents in dermatology with respect to fertility, pregnancy, and lactation.
Grunewald, Sonja;Jank, Alexander;
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 277-89; quiz 290
312 views DOI Abstract
View All 25 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.