Indexed in Journament

archives of osteoporosis

ISSN 1862-3514· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5/100
Journament Score
#10,397
Journament Rank
27
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name arch osteoporos
Abbreviated Name archives of osteoporosis
ISSN 1862-3514

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2015
Bone mineral density screening and its accordance with Canadian clinical practice guidelines from 2000–2013: an unchanging landscape in Saskatchewan, Canada
McLeod, K.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
475 views DOI
2019
Cost-benefit analysis of calcium and vitamin D supplements
Weaver, C.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
434 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Estimated expenditures for hip fractures using merged healthcare insurance data for individuals aged ≥ 75 years and long-term care insurance claims data in Japan (Archives of Osteoporosis, (2018), 13, 1, (37), 10.1007/s11657-018-0448-2)
Mori, T.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
409 views DOI
2019
Trabecular bone score and bone mineral density reference data for women aged 20–70 years and the effect of local reference data on the prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka
Rathnayake, H.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
348 views DOI
2019
The epidemiology of osteoporosis, associated fragility fractures, and management gap in China
Yu, F.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
344 views DOI
2019
An investigation into the effects of kinesiotaping for posture correction on kyphosis angle, pain, and balance in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis-associated thoracic kyphosis
Bulut, D.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2018
Initial hospitalization with rigorous bed rest followed by bracing and rehabilitation as an option of conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures in elderly patients: a pilot one arm safety and feasibility study
Abe, T.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
330 views DOI
2019
Vitamin D cutoff point in relation to parathyroid hormone: a population based study in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia
AlQuaiz, A.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
327 views DOI
2020
Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in Ecuador.
Maldonado, Genessis;Intriago, Maria;Larroude, Maria;Aguilar, Gabriel;Moreno, Mario;Gonzalez, Jose;Vargas, Sara;Vera, Claudia;Rios, Karla;Rios, Carlos;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 6
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bone mineral density and its correlation with vitamin D status in healthy school-going children of Western India
Sharawat, I.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2024
Bone mineral density T-scores comparison between obese and non-obese individuals included in a Fracture Liaison Service following a recent fragility fracture
Marchasson, G.
Vol. 19 , pp. 0-0
60 views DOI
2020
A systematic review of the Irish osteoporotic vertebral fracture literature.
McCabe, Eva;Ibrahim, Ammar;Singh, Rajneet;Kelly, Michael;Armstrong, Catherine;Heaney, Fiona;Bergin, Diane;McCabe, John P;Carey, John J;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 34
248 views DOI Abstract
2020
No impact of anti-Rank ligand and PTH analogs on cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Ferrieres, L.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
237 views DOI
2020
Association between osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine: a case-control study
López, Picazo M.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
245 views DOI
2020
Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in Ecuador.
Maldonado, Genessis;Intriago, Maria;Larroude, Maria;Aguilar, Gabriel;Moreno, Mario;Gonzalez, Jose;Vargas, Sara;Vera, Claudia;Rios, Karla;Rios, Carlos;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 6
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Vitamin D supplementation and muscle strength in pre-sarcopenic elderly Lebanese people: a randomized controlled trial
El, Hajj C.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
215 views DOI
2019
An unusual Chinese case of celiac disease presenting as hypocalcemia and low bone density
Wang, K.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
213 views DOI
2019
Bone measurements at multiple skeletal sites in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—an in vivo correlation study using DXA, HR-pQCT and QCT
Cheuk, K.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
275 views DOI
2019
Age-specific 1-year mortality rates after hip fracture based on the populations in mainland China between the years 2000 and 2018: a systematic analysis
Cui, Z.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2019
Primary screening for increased fracture risk by the FRAX® questionnaire—uptake rates in relation to invitation method
Moberg, L.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
243 views DOI
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.