Indexed in Journament

international agrophysics

ISSN 0236-8722· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,661 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 5.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international agrophysics
Abbreviated Name international agrophysics
ISSN 0236-8722
URL http://www.international-agrophysics.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international agrophysics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 19.5 24.1
Community Impact 2.9 4.2
Content Distribution 78.1 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2016
study of the correlations between fractional exhaled nitric oxide in exhaled breath and atopic status, blood eosinophils, fcer2 mutation, and asthma control in vietnamese children
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 163-170
310 views Abstract
2016
step-down therapy in well-controlled asthmatic patients using salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate combination therapy
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 65-70
290 views Abstract
2018
a purinergic p2y6 receptor agonist prodrug modulates airway inflammation, remodeling, and hyperreactivity in a mouse model of asthma
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 159-171
285 views Abstract
2013
utility of adjunctive macrolide therapy in treatment of children with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 23-29
262 views Abstract
2013
a direct comparison of efficacy between desloratadine and rupatadine in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 31-39
246 views Abstract
2014
anaphylaxis avoidance and management: educating patients and their caregivers
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 95-104
244 views Abstract
2014
link between vitamin d and airway remodeling
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 23-30
162 views Abstract
2018
anaphylaxis: getting to the point (and price) of diagnosis and treatment
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 109-110
158 views Abstract
2017
development of an allergy management support system in primary care
Vol. Volume10 , pp. 57-65
158 views Abstract
2018
anaphylaxis: getting to the point (and price) of diagnosis and treatment
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 109-110
158 views Abstract
2018
a purinergic p2y6 receptor agonist prodrug modulates airway inflammation, remodeling, and hyperreactivity in a mouse model of asthma
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 159-171
285 views Abstract
2017
development of an allergy management support system in primary care
Vol. Volume10 , pp. 57-65
158 views Abstract
2017
para-phenylenediamine allergy: current perspectives on diagnosis and management
Vol. Volume10 , pp. 9-15
123 views Abstract
2016
study of the correlations between fractional exhaled nitric oxide in exhaled breath and atopic status, blood eosinophils, fcer2 mutation, and asthma control in vietnamese children
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 163-170
310 views Abstract
2016
step-down therapy in well-controlled asthmatic patients using salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate combination therapy
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 65-70
290 views Abstract
2014
link between vitamin d and airway remodeling
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 23-30
162 views Abstract
2014
anaphylaxis avoidance and management: educating patients and their caregivers
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 95-104
244 views Abstract
2013
a direct comparison of efficacy between desloratadine and rupatadine in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 31-39
246 views Abstract
Journament Score
23.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,661 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

23.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

78.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.