international agrophysics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2318 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

international agrophysics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name international agrophysics
Abbreviated Name international agrophysics
ISSN 0236-8722
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.international-agrophysics.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2016
Physiognomic structure of agro-forestry landscapes: Method of evaluation and guidelines for design, on the example of the West Polesie Biosphere Reserve
Chmielewski, T.
Vol. 30 , pp. 415-429
308 views DOI
2016
study of the correlations between fractional exhaled nitric oxide in exhaled breath and atopic status, blood eosinophils, fcer2 mutation, and asthma control in vietnamese children
;Nguyen-Thi-Bich H;Duong-Thi-Ly H;Thom VT;Pham-Thi-Hong N;Dinh LD;Le-Thi-Minh H;Craig TJ;Duong-Quy S
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 163-170
280 views Abstract
2016
step-down therapy in well-controlled asthmatic patients using salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate combination therapy
;Horiuchi K;Kasahara K;Kuroda Y;Morohoshi H;Hagiwara Y;Ishii G
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 65-70
266 views Abstract
2018
a purinergic p2y6 receptor agonist prodrug modulates airway inflammation, remodeling, and hyperreactivity in a mouse model of asthma
;Chetty A;Sharda A;Warburton R;Weinberg EO;Dong J;Fang M;Sahagian GG;Chen T;Xue C;Castellot JJ;Haydon PG;Nielsen HC
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 159-171
258 views Abstract
2013
utility of adjunctive macrolide therapy in treatment of children with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
;Mikailov A;Kane I;Aronoff SC;Luck R;DelVecchio MT
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 23-29
242 views Abstract
2013
a direct comparison of efficacy between desloratadine and rupatadine in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
;Lukat KF;Rivas P;Roger A;Kowalski ML;Botzen U;Wessel F;Sanquer F;Agache I;Izquierdo I
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 31-39
226 views Abstract
2014
anaphylaxis avoidance and management: educating patients and their caregivers
;Järvinen KM;Celestin J
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 95-104
208 views Abstract
2018
anaphylaxis: getting to the point (and price) of diagnosis and treatment
;Moss RB
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 109-110
138 views Abstract
2017
development of an allergy management support system in primary care
;Flokstra - de Blok BMJ;van der Molen T;Christoffers WA;Kocks JWH;Oei RL;Oude Elberink JNG;Roerdink EM;Schuttelaar ML;van der Velde JL;Brakel TM;Dubois AEJ
Vol. Volume10 , pp. 57-65
136 views Abstract
2014
link between vitamin d and airway remodeling
;Berraies A;Hamzaoui K;Hamzaoui A
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 23-30
135 views Abstract
View All 11 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.