south african medical journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3493 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 1 semaine

south african medical journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
scopus doaj
Nom Abrégé south african medical journal
Nom Abrégé south african medical journal
ISSN
Objectifs et Portée
URL
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2018
impact of the international nosocomial infection control consortium (inicc)’s multidimensional approach on rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units in 22 hospitals of 14 cities of the kingdom of saudi arabia
;Hail M. Al-Abdely;Yassir Khidir Mohammed;Victor D. Rosenthal;Pablo W. Orellano;Mohamed ALazhary;Eman Kaid;Anan Al-Attas;Ghadeer Hawsawi;Ashraf Kelany;Bedoor Hussein;Bayan Esam;Rami Altowerqi;Modhi A. Alkamaly;Nader A. Tawfic;Elinita Cruzpero;Raya M. Al Rashidi;Reny Thomas;Apsia M. Molano;Hessa A. Al Enazy;Fatima M. Al Adwani;Arlu M. Casuyon Pahilanga;Sharifa Alatawi;Raslan Nakhla;Fatma M. Al Adwani;Rosita Gasmin Aromin;Evangelina Balon Ubalde;Hanan Hanafy Diab;Nahla A. Kader;Ibtesam Y. Hassan Assiry;Fahad A. Sawan;Hassan E. Ammari;Alhasan M. Mashiakhy;Elaine B. Santiago;Christian M.S. Chua;Imee M. Dalis;Haider M. Arishi;Ruthelma Lozada;Ibrahim A.M. Al-Zaydani Asiri;Hala Ahmed;Al Jarie;Ali S.M. Al-Qathani;Halima Y. Al-Alkami;Mervat AlDalaton;Siti J.B. Alih;Mohammed J. Alaliany;Najla J. Helali;Grace Sindayen;Annalyn A. Malificio;Haya B. Al Dossari;Abdulmajid G. Algethami;Dia Mohamed;Leigh Yanne;Avigail Tan;Sheema Babu;Shatha M. Abduljabbar;Hala Rushdi;Janice Fernandez;Waleed M. Hussain;Renuga D. Rajavel;Syed Z. Bukhari;Abdullah A. Turkistani;Jeyashri J. Mushtaq;Eida Albeladi;Sally Aboushoushah;Nahed Qushmaq;Leide Shyrine;Jomol Philipose;Mohamed Raees;Nawal S. AbdulKhalik;Marjory Madco;Mohd Abdulghany;Athena Manao;Catherine Acostan;Rania Safwat;Muhammad Halwani;Nahla A.H. Abdul Aal;Anumol Thomas;Shaymaa M. Abdulatif;Nelia C. Ariola;Aisha H. Mutwalli;Nelia Ariola;Eatedal Bohlega;Saly Simon;Estelita Damlig;Sherin G. Elsherbini;Ilama T. Krishne;Sheela Abraham;Mohammed A. Ali Karrar;Nisreen A. Gosn;Abdulaziz A. Al Hindi;Rasha N. Jaha;Saeda M. AlQahtani;Ali O. Abdul Aziz;Nadia L. Demaisip;Elizabeth Laungayan Cortez;Analen F. Cabato;Jerlie M. Gonzales Celiz;Mohammed A. Al Raey;Saeed A. Al Darani;Misbah R. Aziz;Batool A. Manea;Eslam Samy;Solita Briones;Radhika Krishnan;Saman S.M. Raees;Kehkashan Tabassum;Khalid M. Ghalilah;Mohamed Alradady;Abdulrahim Al Qatri;Mafaten Chaouali;Magdy Elsisi;Hajer A. Aldossary;Shehab Al-Suliman;Amina A. Al Talib;Nadira Albaghly;Mohammad E. Haqlre Mia;Manal M. Al-Gethamy;Dhafer M. Alamri;Adnan S. Al-Saadi;Evelyn P. Ayugat;Nawaf A. Al Hazazi;Modi I. Al Hussain;Yvonne Caminade;Ann J. Santos;Mohamed H. Abdulwahab;Bushra T.A. Al-Garni
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 677-684
544 views Abstract
2013
premarital screening and genetic counseling program: knowledge, attitude, and satisfaction of attendees of governmental outpatient clinics in jeddah
;Nahla Khamis Ibrahim;Jamel Bashawri;Hussein Al Bar;Jawaher Al Ahmadi;Adnan Al Bar;Mahdi Qadi;Waleed Milaat;Hashim Feda
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 41-54
517 views Abstract
2017
chicken pox infection in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center in india
;Vanita Noronha;Vikas Ostwal;Anant Ramaswamy;Amit Joshi;Reena Nair;Shripad D. Banavali;Kumar Prabhash
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 8-13
356 views Abstract
2018
South African clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
Wilkinson, M.
Vol. 108 , pp. 23-27
321 views DOI
2015
indications for the hpv vaccine in adolescents: a review of the literature
;Gláucia Resende Soares;Rúbia da Rocha Vieira;Eduardo Piza Pellizzer;Glauco Issamu Miyahara
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 105-116
314 views Abstract
2020
mutation analysis of the neuraminidase gene of influenza a(h1n1)pdm09 in tunisia between 2009 and 2017 seasons
;Awatef El Moussi;Salma Abid;Latifa Charaa;Mejda Nasr;Najoua Jarroudi;Dorra Arab Ennigrou;Ichak Landolssi;Francisco Pozo;Inmaculada Casas;Rod Daniels;Burcu Ermetal;John McCauley;Amine Slim
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 463-464
301 views
2016
The capabilities and scope-of-practice requirements of advanced life support practitioners undertaking critical care transfers: A Delphi study
Venter, Monique;Stassen, Willem;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 58-61
288 views Abstract
2012
an assessment of the emergency response among health workers involved in the 2010 cholera outbreak in northern nigeria
;David A. Oladele;Kolawole S. Oyedeji;Mary-Theresa Niemogha;Francisca Nwaokorie;Moses Bamidele;Adesola Z. Musa;Adeniyi K. Adeneye;Tajudeen A. Bamidele;Michael Ochoga;Kehinde A. Akinsinde;Bartholomew I. Brai;Emmanuel A. Omonigbehin;Toun W. Fesobi;Stella I. Smith;Innocent A. Ujah
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 346-353
284 views Abstract
1986
Epidemiological research methods. Part II. Descriptive studies
Botha, J.
Vol. 70 , pp. 766-772
280 views
2017
characterization of a group b streptococcus infection based on the demographics, serotypes, antimicrobial susceptibility and genotypes of selected isolates from sterile and non-sterile isolation sites in three major hospitals in malaysia
;Mohd E.S. Suhaimi;Mohd N.M. Desa;Narges Eskandarian;Stella G. Pillay;Zalina Ismail;Vasantha K. Neela;Siti N. Masri;Syafinaz A. Nordin
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 14-21
264 views Abstract
View All 17 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.