International journal of circumpolar health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2293 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

International journal of circumpolar health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Int J Circumpolar Health
Abbreviated Name int j circumpolar health
ISSN 2242-3982
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.circumpolarhealthjournal.net
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2013
Effects of increase in temperature and open water on transmigration and access to health care by the Nenets reindeer herders in northern Russia.
Amstislavski, Philippe;Zubov, Leonid;Chen, Herman;Ceccato, Pietro;Pekel, Jean-Francois;Weedon, Jeremy;
Vol. 72
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mental health services in the Northwest Territories: a scoping review.
Elman, Aviva;Etter, Meghan;Fairman, Kimberly;Chatwood, Susan;
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. 1629783
395 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coverage rates of the children vaccination programme in Greenland.
Albertsen, Nadja;Lynge, Anna Rask;Skovgaard, Nils;Olesen, Jesper Søndergaard;Pedersen, Michael Lynge;
Vol. 79 , No. 1 , pp. 1721983
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
The north is not all the same: comparing health system performance in 18 northern regions of Canada.
Young, T Kue;Chatwood, Susan;Ng, Carmina;Young, Robin W;Marchildon, Gregory P;
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. 1697474
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rural360: incubating socially accountable research in the Canadian North
Asghari, Shabnam;Heeley, Thomas;Walsh, Anna;Rourke, James;Bethune, Cheri;Graham, Wendy;
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. -
339 views Abstract
2019
Management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) in a rural part of North Norway with a scattered population: does living near the department of oncology translate into a different pattern of care and survival?
Nieder, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 1620086
336 views DOI
2020
abdominal wall defect found at the first-trimester ultrasound scan
;Marilia Freixo;Elisa Soares;Maria Coelho;Carla Marinho;Ana Rita Pinto;Graça Rodrigues
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 125-127
323 views DOI
2014
diagnostic utility of us for detecting rotator cuff tears in rheumatoid arthritis patients: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
;Der-Yuan Chen;Howard Haw-Chang Lan;Kuo-Lung Lai;Hsin-Hua Chen;Yi-Ming Chen;Chan-Pein Chen
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 200-206
292 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sekuwe (My House): building health equity through Dene First Nations housing designs
Larcombe, L.
Vol. 79 , pp. 1717278
280 views DOI
2013
Intimate partner violence in the Canadian territorial north: Perspectives from a literature review and a media watch
Moffitt, P.
Vol. 72 , pp. 0-0
255 views DOI
View All 14 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.