aerospace medicine and human performance | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5634 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

aerospace medicine and human performance

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name aerosp med hum perform
Abbreviated Name aerosp med hum perform
ISSN 2375-6322
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2017
Metabolic Syndrome and Cardio-Cerebrovascular Risk Disparities Between Pilots and Aircraft Mechanics.
Kim, Myeong-Bo;Kim, Hyun-Jin;Kim, Soo-Hyeon;Lee, Suk-Ho;Lee, Se-Ho;Park, Won-Ju;
Vol. 88 , No. 9 , pp. 866-870
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
Concurrent Pilot Instrument Monitoring in the Automated Multi-Crew Airline Cockpit.
Jarvis, Stephen R;
Vol. 88 , No. 12 , pp. 1100-1106
324 views DOI Abstract
2015
Exercise Countermeasure Hardware Evolution on ISS: The First Decade.
Korth, Deborah W;
Vol. 86 , No. 12 Suppl , pp. A7-A13
324 views DOI Abstract
2016
Characterization of Low Back Pain in Pilots and Maintenance Technicians on a Commercial Airline.
Fajardo Rodriguez, Hugo A;Ortiz Mayorga, Viviana A;
Vol. 87 , No. 9 , pp. 795-9
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Pilots.
Mulloy, Andrew;Wielgosz, Andreas;
Vol. 90 , No. 8 , pp. 730-734
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
Sleep and Fatigue Differences in the Two Most Common Types of Commercial Flight Operations.
Reis, Cátia;Mestre, Catarina;Canhão, Helena;Gradwell, David;Paiva, Teresa;
Vol. 87 , No. 9 , pp. 811-5
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
Flying After Conducting an Aircraft Excessive Cabin Leakage Test.
Houston, Stephen;Wilkinson, Elizabeth;
Vol. 87 , No. 9 , pp. 816-20
287 views DOI Abstract
2018
Cardiac Inflight Incapacitations of U.S. Airline Pilots: 1995-2015.
DeJohn, Charles A;Mills, William D;Hathaway, William;Larcher, Julie;
Vol. 89 , No. 9 , pp. 837-841
277 views DOI Abstract
2015
Eosinophilic esophagitis with dysphagia and food impaction in a young adult
Cochet, A.
Vol. 86 , pp. 742-746
270 views DOI
2015
assessment of the irrigation feasibility of low-cost filtered municipal wastewater for red amaranth (amaranthus tricolor l cv. surma)
;Gokul Chandra Biswas;Animesh Sarkar;Md H. Rashid;Monirul Hassan Shohan;Mirajul Islam;Qingyue Wang
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 239-252
267 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.