Indexed in Journament

critical care nursing clinics of north america

ISSN 1558-3481· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,445 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 54.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name crit care nurs clin north am
Abbreviated Name crit care nurs clin north am
ISSN 1558-3481
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-care-nursing-clinics-of-north-america

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 54.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 75.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for critical care nursing clinics of north america
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 54.0 31.2
Community Impact 6.4 13.4
Content Distribution 75.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2012
synthesis of poly(para-phenylene terephthalamide) and preparation of short fibers: effect of sodium sulphate on the fibers
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 113-120
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stroke Volume Optimization: Utilization of the Newest Cardiac Vital Sign: Considerations in Recovery from Cardiac Surgery.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 329-348
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
Big Data in Neonatal Health Care: Big Reach, Big Reward?
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 481-497
335 views DOI Abstract
2015
the importance and influence of rheological properties of polymer solutions in phase inversion process and morphology of polymeric membranes
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 371-351
321 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of nanoclay on mechanical properties and ablation behavior of a nitrile-based heat insulator
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 449-458
297 views DOI Abstract
2010
properties of dental adhesives incorporated with boehmite nano-particles
Vol. 23 , No. 5 , pp. 423-433
290 views DOI Abstract
2008
preparation of silicious mesoporous spherical and rod- like mcm-41 using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide as the structure directing agent
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 243-250
272 views DOI Abstract
2010
production of polystyrene open-celled microcellular foam in batch process by super critical co2
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 223-234
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stroke Volume Optimization: Utilization of the Newest Cardiac Vital Sign: Considerations in Recovery from Cardiac Surgery.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 329-348
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
Big Data in Neonatal Health Care: Big Reach, Big Reward?
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 481-497
335 views DOI Abstract
2016
preparation of ethylene vinyl acetate/zeolite 4a mixed matrix membrane for co2/n2 separation
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 231-247
264 views DOI Abstract
2015
relationship between the process parameters and resin content of a glass/epoxy prepreg produced by dipping method
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 402-391
172 views DOI Abstract
2015
the importance and influence of rheological properties of polymer solutions in phase inversion process and morphology of polymeric membranes
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 371-351
321 views DOI Abstract
2013
mechanical and morphological properties of waste short nylon fibers and nanoclay reinforced nr/sbr rubber nanocomposites
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 491-501
165 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of nanoclay on mechanical properties and ablation behavior of a nitrile-based heat insulator
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 449-458
297 views DOI Abstract
2013
modification of asphalt pavement with polysulfide polymer
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 241-249
143 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,445 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.