biochimica et biophysica acta - gene regulatory mechanisms | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1310 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

biochimica et biophysica acta - gene regulatory mechanisms

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name biochimica et biophysica acta - gene regulatory mechanisms
Abbreviated Name biochimica et biophysica acta - gene regulatory mechanisms
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2014
whether the spetzler-martin grading scale is adequate to children with intracranial arteriovenous malformations?
;Hung-Che Lin;Wen-Yen Huang;Shyi-Jou Chen;Chun-Jung Juan;Yuan-Hao Chen;Hsin-I Ma;Yu-Ching Chou;Jiunn-Tay Lee;Giia-Sheun Peng;Ya-Ling Chou;Hueng-Chuen Fan
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 104-109
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
the mechanism of high transfection efficiency of human serum albumin conjugated polyethylenimine in a549 cells
;Ssu-Wei Peng;Wei-Hsu Ko;Ming-Kung Yeh;Chiao-Hsi Chiang;Jiin-Long Chen
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 57-61
259 views DOI Abstract
2018
The AU-rich element landscape across human transcriptome reveals a large proportion in introns and regulation by ELAVL1/HuR
Bakheet, T.
Vol. 1861 , pp. 167-177
239 views DOI
2016
using benzodiazepine detoxification and cognitive behavioral psychotherapy in the treatment of a patient with generalized anxiety disorder comorbid with high-dose zolpidem dependence
;Shen-Hua Lu;Nian-Sheng Tzeng;Han-Wei Chou
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. 194-196
238 views DOI Abstract
2014
heart transplantation for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries
;Jenn-Yeu Song;Shih-Ying Sung;Chung-Yi Lee;Yi-Chang Lin;Po-Shun Hsu;Chih-Yuan Lin;Yi-Ting Tsai;Chien-Sung Tsai
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 193-194
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
delayed intracranial subdural hematoma following removal of an intraspinal tumor: a case report and review of the literature
;Chun-Chieh Liang;Wen-Jui Liao;Jung-Tung Liu;Cheng-Siu Chang
Vol. 37 , No. 6 , pp. 253-255
221 views DOI Abstract
2014
frame-based stereotactic deep brain stimulation for parkinson′s disease: 12 months outcomes for patients in cross hair versus non-cross hair application groups
;Tung-Han Tsai;Da-Tong Ju;Yi-Lin Yu;Chi-Tun Tang;Yu-Ching Chou;Yung-Hsiao Chiang;Shinn-Zong Lin;Yuan-Hao Chen
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 166-174
214 views DOI Abstract
2014
lupus flare in a manifestation of consecutive hypotony maculopathy after trabeculectomy
;Ke-Hung Chien;Da-Wen Lu;Ming-Cheng Tai
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. 280-282
179 views DOI Abstract
2017
combination of hypertonic saline and fibrin glue: another selection to treat chronic enterocutaneous fistula
;Po-Chang Hsu;Sheng-Der Hsu
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 107-109
176 views DOI Abstract
2015
meigs′ syndrome in an elderly woman with short of breath
;Wan-Chen Tsai;Fung-Wei Chang;Junn-Liang Chang;Hong-Ming Chao
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 125-127
164 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.