Cancer epidemiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#96 / 33,784
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
60
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

Cancer epidemiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Cancer Epidemiol
Abbreviated Name cancer epidemiology
ISSN 18777821
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Burak Şener on Jul 08, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (90 total)

2017
Acceptability and feasibility of a community based participatory research project comparing cytology and urine HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in Yap, Federated States of Micronesia
Sy A.
Vol. 50 , pp. 283-288
410 views DOI
2019
Trends in disability-adjusted life years of lung cancer among women from 2004 to 2030 in Guangzhou, China: A population-based study.
Lin, Xiao;Bloom, Michael S;Du, Zhicheng;Hao, Yuantao;
Vol. 63 , pp. 101586
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer and its links to cancer diagnosis and one year mortality: A cohort study of patients referred on the Two Week Wait pathway.
Sheridan, Rebecca;Oliver, Steven E;Hall, Geoff;Allgar, Victoria;Melling, Philip;Bolton, Edward;Atkin, Karl;Denton, Denise;Forbes, Sarah;Green, Trish;Macleod, Una;Knapp, Peter;
Vol. 63 , pp. 101588
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Childhood cancer in India.
Ganguly, Shuvadeep;Kinsey, Sally;Bakhshi, Sameer;
, pp. 101679
279 views DOI Abstract
2018
remaining useful life prediction based on variation coefficient consistency test of a wiener process
;Juan LI;Bo JING;Hongde DAI;Xiaoxuan JIAO;Xiaodong LIU
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 107-116
277 views DOI Abstract
2015
complex variable method for an anti-plane elliptical cavity of one-dimensional hexagonal piezoelectric quasicrystals
;Yu Jing;Guo Junhong;Xing Yongming
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 1287-1295
267 views DOI Abstract
2019
Beta-blocker use and mortality following ovarian cancer diagnosis: a population-based study.
Couttenier, Alexandra;Lacroix, Olivia;Silversmit, Geert;Vaes, Evelien;De Schutter, Harlinde;Robert, Annie;
Vol. 62 , pp. 101579
266 views DOI Abstract
2017
a multi-objective multi-memetic algorithm for network-wide conflict-free 4d flight trajectories planning
;Su YAN;Kaiquan CAI
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1161-1173
262 views DOI Abstract
2016
Risk factors associated with human papillomavirus prevalence and cervical neoplasia among Cameroonian women.
Catarino, Rosa;Vassilakos, Pierre;Tebeu, Pierre-Marie;Schäfer, Sonja;Bongoe, Adamo;Petignat, Patrick;
Vol. 40 , pp. 60-6
262 views DOI Abstract
2020
Changes in lung cancer survival by TNM stage in the Basque country from 2003 to 2014 according to period of diagnosis.
Mar, Javier;Arrospide, Arantzazu;Iruretagoiena, Maria Luisa;Clèries, Ramón;Paredes, Alfredo;Elejoste, Ibone;Sala-Gonzalez, Maria Angeles;Ibarrondo, Oliver;
Vol. 65 , pp. 101668
259 views DOI Abstract
View All 90 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
60
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.