landscape and urban planning | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1272 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

landscape and urban planning

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name landsc urban plan
Abbreviated Name landscape and urban planning
ISSN 0169-2046
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/landscape-and-urban-planning
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2019
The value of small forest fragments and urban tree canopy for Neotropical migrant birds during winter and migration seasons in Latin American countries: A systematic review
Amaya-Espinel, J.
Vol. 190 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2015
A comparison of the economic benefits of urban green spaces estimated with NDVI and with high-resolution land cover data
Li, W.
Vol. 133 , pp. 105-117
298 views DOI
2020
Post-apartheid ecologies in the City of Cape Town: An examination of plant functional traits in relation to urban gradients
Anderson, P.
Vol. 193 , pp. 0-0
287 views DOI
2020
A Conceptual Framework to Untangle the Concept of Urban Ecosystem Services.
Yok Tan, Puay;Zhang, Jingyuan;Masoudi, Mahyar;Berhane Alemu, Jahson;Edwards, Peter J;Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne;Richards, Daniel R;Saunders, Justine;Ping Song, Xiao;Wei Wong, Lynn;
, pp. 103837
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
Exploring synergies between transit investment and dense redevelopment: a scenario analysis in a rapidly urbanizing landscape.
Coxa, L;Bassi, A;Kolling, J;Procter, A;Flanders, N;Tanners, N;Araujo, R;
Vol. 167 , pp. 429-440
283 views DOI Abstract
2019
Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities
Berchoux, T.
Vol. 189 , pp. 307-319
262 views DOI
revision of the south american freshwater fish genus laemolyta cope, 1872 (ostariophysi: characiformes: anostomidae)
;Kelly Cristina Mautari;Naércio Aquino Menezes
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 27-44
259 views DOI Abstract
on the origin and diversification of venezuelan freshwater fishes: the genus gephyrocharax (ostariophysi: characidae) a case study
;Ana Bonilla-Rivero;Héctor López-Rojas
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 487-496
259 views DOI Abstract
acclimation of juvenile mugil liza valenciennes, 1836 (mugiliformes: mugilidae) to different environmental salinities
;Viviana Lisboa;Indianara F. Barcarolli;Luís A. Sampaio;Adalto Bianchini
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 591-598
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing hydropower dam location and removal in the São Francisco river basin, Brazil to balance hydropower and river biodiversity tradeoffs
O'Hanley, J.
Vol. 195 , pp. 0-0
250 views DOI
View All 46 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.