Indexed in Journament

landscape and urban planning

ISSN 0169-2046· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,564 of 29,297 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 94.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name landsc urban plan
Abbreviated Name landscape and urban planning
ISSN 0169-2046
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/landscape-and-urban-planning

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 72.5 24.8
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.1
Content Distribution 74.3 89.1
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2020
A Conceptual Framework to Untangle the Concept of Urban Ecosystem Services.
Yok Tan, Puay;Zhang, Jingyuan;Masoudi, Mahyar;Berhane Alemu, Jahson;Edwards, Peter J;Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne;Richards, Daniel R;Saunders, Justine;Ping Song, Xiao;Wei Wong, Lynn;
, pp. 103837
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
The value of small forest fragments and urban tree canopy for Neotropical migrant birds during winter and migration seasons in Latin American countries: A systematic review
Amaya-Espinel, J.
Vol. 190 , pp. 0-0
363 views DOI
2015
A comparison of the economic benefits of urban green spaces estimated with NDVI and with high-resolution land cover data
Li, W.
Vol. 133 , pp. 105-117
348 views DOI
2017
Exploring synergies between transit investment and dense redevelopment: a scenario analysis in a rapidly urbanizing landscape.
Coxa, L;Bassi, A;Kolling, J;Procter, A;Flanders, N;Tanners, N;Araujo, R;
Vol. 167 , pp. 429-440
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Post-apartheid ecologies in the City of Cape Town: An examination of plant functional traits in relation to urban gradients
Anderson, P.
Vol. 193 , pp. 0-0
319 views DOI
acclimation of juvenile mugil liza valenciennes, 1836 (mugiliformes: mugilidae) to different environmental salinities
;Viviana Lisboa;Indianara F. Barcarolli;Luís A. Sampaio;Adalto Bianchini
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 591-598
316 views DOI Abstract
revision of the south american freshwater fish genus laemolyta cope, 1872 (ostariophysi: characiformes: anostomidae)
;Kelly Cristina Mautari;Naércio Aquino Menezes
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 27-44
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities
Berchoux, T.
Vol. 189 , pp. 307-319
309 views DOI
on the origin and diversification of venezuelan freshwater fishes: the genus gephyrocharax (ostariophysi: characidae) a case study
;Ana Bonilla-Rivero;Héctor López-Rojas
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 487-496
297 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing hydropower dam location and removal in the São Francisco river basin, Brazil to balance hydropower and river biodiversity tradeoffs
O'Hanley, J.
Vol. 195 , pp. 0-0
287 views DOI
2021
Compact development and adherence to stay-at-home order during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal investigation in the United States
Hamidi, S.
Vol. 205 , pp. 0-0
119 views DOI
2020
A Conceptual Framework to Untangle the Concept of Urban Ecosystem Services.
Yok Tan, Puay;Zhang, Jingyuan;Masoudi, Mahyar;Berhane Alemu, Jahson;Edwards, Peter J;Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne;Richards, Daniel R;Saunders, Justine;Ping Song, Xiao;Wei Wong, Lynn;
, pp. 103837
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing hydropower dam location and removal in the São Francisco river basin, Brazil to balance hydropower and river biodiversity tradeoffs
O'Hanley, J.
Vol. 195 , pp. 0-0
287 views DOI
2020
Research note: Spatial planning in Europe and Central Asia – Enhancing the consideration of biodiversity and ecosystem services
Albert, C.
Vol. 196 , pp. 0-0
242 views DOI
2020
Biogeochemical and socioeconomic drivers of above- and below-ground carbon stocks in urban residential yards of a small city
Contosta, A.
Vol. 196 , pp. 0-0
187 views DOI
2020
Effects of sampling approaches on quantifying urban forest structure
Jin, J.
Vol. 195 , pp. 0-0
186 views DOI
2020
Post-apartheid ecologies in the City of Cape Town: An examination of plant functional traits in relation to urban gradients
Anderson, P.
Vol. 193 , pp. 0-0
319 views DOI
2019
Effects of highways on bird distribution and soundscape diversity around Aldo Leopold's shack in Baraboo, Wisconsin, USA
Ghadiri, Khanaposhtani M.
Vol. 192 , pp. 0-0
165 views DOI
2019
Parking provision at nature conservation sites and its implications for visitor use
Weitowitz, D.
Vol. 190 , pp. 0-0
175 views DOI
2019
Urban forest governance and decision-making: A systematic review and synthesis of the perspectives of municipal managers
Ordóñez, C.
Vol. 189 , pp. 166-180
208 views DOI
Journament Score
40.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,564 of 29,297 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.