Indexed in Journament

Health & place

ISSN 1873-2054· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,405 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 81.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Health Place
Abbreviated Name health place
ISSN 1873-2054
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/health-and-place

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 13.6
Content Distribution 88.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Health & place
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 13.6 9.7
Content Distribution 88.1 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how.
Vol. 58 , pp. 102161
442 views DOI Abstract
2018
Green pastures: Do US real estate prices respond to population health?
Vol. 49 , pp. 59-67
431 views DOI Abstract
2012
las enfermeras ante las voluntades anticipadas: un reto jurídico, ético y práctico
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 43-50
426 views Abstract
2012
modelo innovador: “cuidado a las enfermeras en el afrontamiento al estrés en una unidad de cuidados intensivos”.
Vol. 6 , No. 03 , pp. -
398 views Abstract
2020
Causally speaking: Challenges in measuring gentrification for population health research in the United States and Canada.
Vol. 63 , pp. 102350
378 views DOI Abstract
2014
Why do young adults with Type 1 diabetes find it difficult to manage diabetes in the workplace?
Vol. 26 , pp. 180-7
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
Seasonal mobility and well-being of older people: The case of 'Snowbirds' to Sanya, China.
Vol. 54 , pp. 155-163
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
The meanings attributed to community gardening: A qualitative study.
Vol. 59 , pp. 102190
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Causally speaking: Challenges in measuring gentrification for population health research in the United States and Canada.
Vol. 63 , pp. 102350
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dengue, chikungunya, and Zika in Cali, Colombia.
Vol. 63 , pp. 102339
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Spatial Lifecourse Epidemiology Reporting Standards (ISLE-ReSt) statement.
Vol. 61 , pp. 102243
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how.
Vol. 58 , pp. 102161
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
The meanings attributed to community gardening: A qualitative study.
Vol. 59 , pp. 102190
354 views DOI Abstract
2018
Green pastures: Do US real estate prices respond to population health?
Vol. 49 , pp. 59-67
431 views DOI Abstract
2018
Seasonal mobility and well-being of older people: The case of 'Snowbirds' to Sanya, China.
Vol. 54 , pp. 155-163
362 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,405 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

88.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.