Angiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#209 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

Angiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Angiology
Abbreviated Name angiology
ISSN 1940-1574
Aim and Scope
URL http://ang.sagepub.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (8 total)

2019
The Association Between SYNTAX Score II and Carotid Artery Disease Severity in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Ermis, Emrah;Yildirim, Erkan;Ucar, Hakan;Allahverdiyev, Samir;Teskin, Onder;Teker, Melike Elif;Ereren, Emrah;Cengiz, Mahir;
, pp. 3319719868360
275 views DOI Abstract
2014
a simple algorithm for analyzing a piled raft by considering stress distribution
;Alireza Saeedi Azizkandi;Ali Fakher
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 215-227
253 views DOI Abstract
2019
Value of Syntax Score II in Prediction of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With NSTE-ACS Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Yildirim, E.
Vol. 70 , pp. 860-866
252 views DOI
2019
Reply to Letter by Yarlioglues et al Entitled "Ethnicity and the Evaluation of Anthropometric Measurements".
Wan, Jindong;Zhou, Peng;Wang, Dan;Wang, Peijian;
, pp. 3319719870396
243 views DOI
2013
the effect of dynamic permeability on velocity and intrinsic attenuation of compressional waves in sand
;Hasan Ghasemzadeh;Amir Abounouri
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 221-231
209 views DOI Abstract
2015
development and practical application of a bridge management system (j-bms) in japan
;Ayaho Miyamoto;Minoru Motoshita
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 189-216
199 views DOI Abstract
2013
seismic behavior evaluation of concrete elevated water tanks
;saeed bozorgmehrnia;malek mohammad ranjbar;rahmat madandoust
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 175-188
196 views DOI Abstract
2023
Validity of Atherosclerotic Calcified Lesions Observed on Low-Dose Computed Tomography and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as Surrogate Markers of Atherosclerosis Progression.
Homma, Satoki;Kato, Kiyoe;
, pp. 33197231155963
126 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.