Body image | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2529 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Body image

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Body Image
Abbreviated Name body image
ISSN 1873-6807
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/body-image
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Stereotypes of physical attractiveness and social influences: The heritage and vision of Dr. Thomas Cash
Rodgers, R.
Vol. 31 , pp. 273-279
676 views DOI
2019
Opening a Pandora's Box that can't be salvaged: Health professionals' perceptions of appearance-related care in an Australian pediatric specialist hospital.
Gee, Caroline;Maskell, Jessica;Newcombe, Peter;Kimble, Roy;Williamson, Heidi;
Vol. 31 , pp. 1-12
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationship between weight stigma, weight bias internalization, and physical health in military personnel with or at high-risk of overweight/obesity
Shank, L.
Vol. 28 , pp. 25-33
345 views DOI
2019
The influence of Grindr, a geosocial networking application, on body image in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: An exploratory study.
Filice, Eric;Raffoul, Amanda;Meyer, Samantha B;Neiterman, Elena;
Vol. 31 , pp. 59-70
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Breast Size Satisfaction Survey (BSSS): Breast size dissatisfaction and its antecedents and outcomes in women from 40 nations.
Swami, Viren;Tran, Ulrich S;Barron, David;Afhami, Reza;Aimé, Annie;Almenara, Carlos A;Alp Dal, Nursel;Amaral, Ana Carolina Soares;Andrianto, Sonny;Anjum, Gulnaz;Argyrides, Marios;Atari, Mohammad;Aziz, Mudassar;Banai, Benjamin;Borowiec, Joanna;Brewis, Alexandra;Cakir Kocak, Yeliz;Campos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini;Carmona, Carmen;Chaleeraktrakoon, Trawin;Chen, Hong;Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit;Choompunuch, Bovornpot;Constantinos, Togas;Crumlish, Aine;Cruz, Julio Eduardo;Dalley, Simon E;Damayanti, Devi;Dare, Joanna;Donofrio, Stacey M;Draksler, Anja;Escasa-Dorne, Michelle;Fernandez, Elaine Frances;Ferreira, Maria Elisa Caputo;Frederick, David A;García, Antonio Alías;Geller, Shulamit;George, Alexias;Ghazieh, Louai;Goian, Cosmin;Gorman, Colin;Grano, Caterina;Handelzalts, Jonathan Eliahu;Horsburgh, Heather;Jackson, Todd;Javela Delgado, Lady Grey Javela;Jović, Marija;Jović, Marko;Kantanista, Adam;Kertechian, Sevag K;Kessels, Loes;Król-Zielińska, Magdalena;Kuan, Garry;Kueh, Yee Cheng;Kumar, Sanjay;Kvalem, Ingela Lundin;Lombardo, Caterina;Luis López Almada, Ernesto;Maïano, Christophe;Manjary, Mandar;Massar, Karlijn;Matera, Camilla;Mereiles, Juliana F Figueiras;Meskó, Norbert;Namatame, Hikari;Nerini, Amanda;Neto, Felix;Neto, Joana;Neves, Angela Nogueira;Ng, Siu-Kuen;Nithiya, Devi R;Omar, Salma Samir;Omori, Mika;Panasiti, Maria Serena;Pavela Banai, Irena;Pila, Eva;Pokrajac-Bulian, Alessandra;Postuvan, Vita;Prichard, Ivanka;Razmus, Magdalena;Sabiston, Catherine M;Sahlan, Reza N;Sarfo, Jacob Owusu;Sawamiya, Yoko;Stieger, Stefan;SturtzSreetharan, Cindi;Tee, Eugene;Ten Hoor, Gill A;Thongpibul, Kulvadee;Tipandjan, Arun;Tudorel, Otilia;Tylka, Tracy;Vally, Zahir;Vargas-Nieto, Juan Camilo;Vega, Luis Diego;Vidal-Mollón, Jose;Vintila, Mona;Williams, Deborah;Wutich, Amber;Yamamiya, Yuko;Zambrano, Danilo;Zanetti, Marcelo Callegari;Živčić-Bećirević, Ivanka;Voracek, Martin;
Vol. 32 , pp. 199-217
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dimensions of internalization relevant to the identity disruption model of body dissatisfaction.
Vartanian, Lenny R;Hayward, Lydia E;
Vol. 32 , pp. 1-4
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of digital alteration information and disclaimer labels attached to fashion magazine advertisements on women's body dissatisfaction.
Tiggemann, Marika;Brown, Zoe;Anderberg, Isabella;
Vol. 30 , pp. 221-227
317 views DOI Abstract
2020
A cluster randomized controlled trial of the SoMe social media literacy body image and wellbeing program for adolescent boys and girls: Study protocol
Gordon, C.S.
Vol. 33 , pp. 27-37
313 views DOI
2020
Physical appearance comparisons and symptoms of disordered eating: The mediating role of social physique anxiety in Spanish adolescents.
Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Manuel;Sicilia, Álvaro;Díez-Fernández, David M;Paterna, Adrian;
Vol. 32 , pp. 145-149
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluative implications of intersecting body weight and other social categories: The role of typicality.
Alt, Nicholas P;Lick, David J;Hunger, Jeffrey M;Johnson, Kerri L;
Vol. 31 , pp. 19-23
301 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.