journal of membrane science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#75 / 33,728
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
48.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
85
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 months ago

journal of membrane science

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j memb sci
Abbreviated Name journal of membrane science
ISSN 03767388
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (76 total)

2019
Preparation of carbon molecular sieve membranes from an optimized ionic liquid-regenerated cellulose precursor
Rodrigues S.
, pp. 390-400
335 views DOI
2017
A new zeolitic hydroxymethylimidazolate material and its use in mixed matrix membranes based on 6FDA-DAM for gas separation
Perea-Cachero A.
Vol. 544 , pp. 88-97
319 views DOI
2019
Carbon molecular sieve membranes for CO<inf>2</inf>/N<inf>2</inf> separations: Evaluating subambient temperature performance
Joglekar M.
Vol. 569 , pp. 1-6
296 views DOI
2019
Characterizing salt permeability in polyamide desalination membranes using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
Shaffer, Devin L;Feldman, Kathleen E;Chan, Edwin P;Stafford, Gery R;Stafford, Christopher M;
Vol. 583
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Facile Cu-BTC surface modification of thin chitosan film coated polyethersulfone membranes with improved antifouling properties for sustainable removal of manganese
Mozafari, M.
, pp. 0-0
292 views DOI
2019
Rigid double-stranded siloxane-induced high-flux carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber membranes for CO<inf>2</inf>/CH<inf>4</inf> separation
Shin J.
, pp. 504-512
287 views DOI
2019
Modelling of anion-exchange membrane transport properties with taking into account the change in exchange capacity and swelling when varying bathing solution concentration and pH
Kozmai, A.
Vol. 590 , pp. 0-0
278 views DOI
2019
A novel method for the fabrication of silver nanowires-based highly electro-conductive membrane with antifouling property for efficient microalgae harvesting
Mushtaq, A.
Vol. 590 , pp. 0-0
273 views DOI
2019
Effects of hydrophilicity of blended submicrogels on the microstructure and performance of thermo-responsive membranes
Li, X.
Vol. 584 , pp. 202-215
272 views DOI
2019
TiO <inf>2</inf> nanoshell@polyimide nanofiber membrane prepared via a surface-alkaline-etching and in-situ complexation-hydrolysis strategy for advanced and safe LIB separator
Dong, G.
, pp. 249-257
263 views DOI
View All 76 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
85
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

48.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.