Indexed in Journament

atmospheric chemistry and physics

ISSN 1680-7316· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,818 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
73 Articles
Scores higher than 80.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name atmospheric chemistry and physics
Abbreviated Name atmospheric chemistry and physics
ISSN 1680-7316

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 61.1
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 59.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for atmospheric chemistry and physics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.2
Accessibility 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 61.1 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 9.3 11.5
Content Distribution 59.5 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (73)

2012
Size-resolved measurement of the mixing state of soot in the megacity Beijing, China: diurnal cycle, aging and parameterization
Vol. 12 , No. 10 , pp. 4477-4491
610 views Abstract
2018
Assessing the impact of the Kuroshio Current on vertical cloud structure using CloudSat data
Vol. 18 , pp. 7657-7667
452 views Abstract
2015
Spatial and temporal variation in CO over Alberta using measurements from satellites, aircraft, and ground stations
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 3893-3908
451 views Abstract
2010
Ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides time series at four alpine GAW mountain stations in central Europe
Vol. 10 , No. 24 , pp. 12295-12316
445 views Abstract
2015
Advantages of a city-scale emission inventory for urban air quality research and policy: the case of Nanjing, a typical industrial city in the Yangtze River Delta, China
Vol. 15 , No. 21 , pp. 12623-12644
440 views Abstract
2017
Validation of OMI, GOME-2A and GOME-2B tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO products using MAX-DOAS observations from 2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China: investigation of the effects of priori profiles and aerosols on the satellite products
Vol. 17 , No. 8 , pp. 5007-5033
408 views Abstract
2009
Satellite observations and modeling of transport in the upper troposphere through the lower mesosphere during the 2006 major stratospheric sudden warming
Vol. 9 , No. 14 , pp. 4775-4795
405 views Abstract
2021
The advective Brewer–Dobson circulation in the ERA5 reanalysis: climatology, variability, and trends
Vol. 21 , No. 10 , pp. 7515-7544
147 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sun photometer retrievals of Saharan dust properties over Barbados during SALTRACE
Vol. 19 , pp. 14571-14583
90 views Abstract
2019
Interactions between the atmosphere, cryosphere, and ecosystems at northern high latitudes
Vol. 19 , pp. 2015-2061
248 views Abstract
2019
Seasonal and diurnal variability in O<sub>3</sub>, black carbon, and CO measured at the Rwanda Climate Observatory
Vol. 19 , pp. 2063-2078
275 views Abstract
2018
Assessing the impact of the Kuroshio Current on vertical cloud structure using CloudSat data
Vol. 18 , pp. 7657-7667
452 views Abstract
Journament Score
39.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,818 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.