Indexed in Journament

veterinary immunology and immunopathology

ISSN 1873-2534· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,920 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 18.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name vet immunol immunopathol
Abbreviated Name vet immunol immunopathol
ISSN 1873-2534
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/503319/description#description

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for veterinary immunology and immunopathology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 9.3 13.4
Content Distribution 67.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2019
Genetic polymorphisms in toll-like receptors 1, 2, and 4 in feline upper respiratory tract aspergillosis.
Vol. 217 , pp. 109921
431 views DOI Abstract
2014
development and properties of cadmium and lead tungstate low-background scintillators for double beta decay experiments
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 92-100
415 views Abstract
2019
Minipigs as a neonatal animal model for tuberculosis vaccine efficacy testing.
Vol. 215 , pp. 109884
378 views DOI Abstract
2013
contents of radionuclides and heavy metals in fish roe of commercial fish of the zaporizhya reservoir
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 81-85
328 views Abstract
2017
excessive lifetime cancer risk and natural radioactivity measurements of granite and sedimentary rock samples
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 371-381
319 views Abstract
2011
research of vertical migration of radionuclides in the soil at testing "red forest" area
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 394-399
296 views Abstract
2020
Effect of the complete replacement of dietary fish meal by soybean meal on histopathology and immune response of the hindgut in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus).
Vol. 221 , pp. 110009
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genetic polymorphisms in toll-like receptors 1, 2, and 4 in feline upper respiratory tract aspergillosis.
Vol. 217 , pp. 109921
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Minipigs as a neonatal animal model for tuberculosis vaccine efficacy testing.
Vol. 215 , pp. 109884
378 views DOI Abstract
2018
carbon target as neutron source from 12c(d,n)13n and d(d,n)3he reactions
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 80-83
276 views DOI Abstract
2018
80-th anniversary of oleksandr ivanovych levon
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 84-85
201 views DOI Abstract
2017
neurobiological effects due to intrauterine exposure of rats with 131i
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 356-360
195 views Abstract
2017
Journament Score
29.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,920 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.