Indexed in Journament

pediatric pulmonology

ISSN 1099-0496· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,002 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 62.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name pediatr pulmonol
Abbreviated Name pediatr pulmonol
ISSN 1099-0496
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10990496

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for pediatric pulmonology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 38.9 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 44.2 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2004
Antigen detection for the diagnosis of pneumonia
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. -
519 views Abstract
2020
A transition program to adult health services for teenagers receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation: A longitudinal qualitative study.
384 views DOI Abstract
2016
Improving knowledge, technical skills, and confidence among pediatric health care providers in the management of chronic tracheostomy using a simulation model.
Vol. 51 , No. 7 , pp. 696-704
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Major depression and psychiatric comorbidity in Turkish children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.
370 views DOI Abstract
2015
infrastructure basis and algorithm of making decision on financing of the cluster initiative
Vol. 1 , No. 4-1 , pp. 149-163
334 views Abstract
2020
Novel coronavirus infection in children outside of Wuhan, China.
332 views DOI Abstract
2024
Regional pulmonary oxygen saturations in late preterm and term infants with respiratory distress at birth
130 views DOI Abstract
2020
Depression and Anxiety in Mothers of Home Ventilated Children Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic.
282 views DOI Abstract
2020
Novel coronavirus infection in children outside of Wuhan, China.
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Insight into COVID-2019 for pediatricians.
236 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of hair cotinine and toxic metal levels in children who were exposed to tobacco smoke.
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
A transition program to adult health services for teenagers receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation: A longitudinal qualitative study.
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Major depression and psychiatric comorbidity in Turkish children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.
370 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,002 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

44.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.