Indexed in Journament

chinese medical journal

ISSN 2542-5641· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,517 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 88% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name chin med j
Abbreviated Name chin med j
ISSN 2542-5641
URL http://www.cmj.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for chinese medical journal
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 11.4 5.8
Content Distribution 61.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2016
Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus among Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Two Chinese Hospitals
Vol. 129 , No. 19 , pp. 2319-2324
642 views Abstract
1987
Clinical classification of 109 chronic myeloid leukemia cases and its correlation with Ph chromosomes
Vol. 100 , No. 4 , pp. -
537 views Abstract
1985
Study on the genetics of basal cell nevus syndrome in one family
Vol. 98 , No. 7 , pp. -
421 views Abstract
2020
Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in residual tumors of patients with triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
417 views DOI Abstract
2012
does foreign aid accelerate economic growth? an empirical analysis for nigeria
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 423-431
381 views Abstract
2015
Changes in Rat Brain MicroRNA Expression Profiles Following Sevoflurane and Propofol Anesthesia
Vol. 128 , No. 11 , pp. 1510-1515
377 views Abstract
2020
Expert consensus on management principles of orthopedic emergency in the epidemic of Corona Virus Disease 2019.
371 views DOI
1983
2021
Potential molecular biomarkers used to predict the response to biological therapies in ulcerative colitis
Vol. 134 , No. 9 , pp. -
237 views Abstract
2020
Expert consensus on management principles of orthopedic emergency in the epidemic of Corona Virus Disease 2019.
371 views DOI
2020
Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in residual tumors of patients with triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Calcitriol enhances pyrazinamide treatment of murine tuberculosis.
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
Long-term Follow-up of 5 Survivors after the First Outbreak of Human Infections with Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus in Shanghai, China
Vol. 129 , No. 17 , pp. 2128-2130
78 views
2016
Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus among Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Two Chinese Hospitals
Vol. 129 , No. 19 , pp. 2319-2324
642 views Abstract
2015
Prophylactic Antitumor Effect of Mixed Heat Shock Proteins/Peptides in Mouse Sarcoma
Vol. 128 , No. 16 , pp. 2234-2241
263 views Abstract
2015
Changes in Rat Brain MicroRNA Expression Profiles Following Sevoflurane and Propofol Anesthesia
Vol. 128 , No. 11 , pp. 1510-1515
377 views Abstract
Journament Score
38.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,517 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.