tataloka | Journament

Journal Ranking

#899 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

tataloka

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name tataloka
Abbreviated Name tataloka
ISSN 2356-0266
Aim and Scope
Tataloka is a peer reviewed journal publishing scientific articles, focusing mainly on research and studies in the field of urban and regional planning. TATALOKA Journal is published quarterly by Biro Penerbit Planologi (Planologi Publishing), Diponegoro University every February, May, August, and November.
URL https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka
Author Instructions https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/about/submissions#authorGuidelines

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2016
ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG LAHAN DI KOTA BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA
Fahimuddin, Muhammad Mu’min;Barus, Baba;Mulatsih, Sri;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 183-196
443 views Abstract
2016
the impact of the neighborhood on the economic mobility, examining the social networks of inhabitants of three segregated neighborhoods from salvador de bahia (brazil), from the social concept isolation
;Stephan Treuke
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 6-29
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
PDRB Hijau dalam Perkembangan Wilayah di Kota Depok
Setyo Nugroho;Kukuh Murtilaksono;Seokmana Soma;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 222-235
288 views DOI Abstract
2020
Analisis Eksistensi Benda Cagar Budaya Dalam Tata Ruang Kota Guna Mendukung Pelestariannya di Kota Surakarta.
Nindya Ayu Wardani;Baba Barus;Siti Nurisyah;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 146-161
268 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Temukus-Besakih, Karangasem, Bali untuk Mendukung Pariwisata Berbasis Desa Wisata
Ni Putu Diah Untari Ningsih;Soenarto Soenarto;Sugiyono Sugiyono;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 212-221
264 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sustainable Tourism Strategy for the City of Kupang's Lasiana Coastal Area
Rulina Yismaya Titu E;Santy Paulla Dewi;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 299-307
260 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perubahan dan Prediksi Penggunaan Lahan Menggunakan Markov – Cellular Automata di Kota Batu
Fahrizal Kreshna Yudichandra;Widiatmaka Widiatmaka;Syaiful Anwar;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 202-211
255 views DOI Abstract
2020
Integrasi Ruang Biru Pada Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Sebagai Instrumen Mitigasi Bencana Banjir di Kota Semarang
Khristiana Dwi Astuti;S Sariffuddin;P Pangi;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 236-248
255 views DOI Abstract
2020
Analisis Risiko Bencana Kebakaran di Kecamatan Tambora Kota Administrasi Jakarta Barat
Nuniek Sutanti;Boedi Tjahjono;Lailan Syaufina;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 162-174
249 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social Relationship Between Kampong Gendong Residents and Gated/Non-Gated Community in Sendangmulyo Village Tembalang District, Semarang
Retno Susanti;Retno Widjajanti;Grandy Loranessa Wungo;Intan Budiarti;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 261-270
243 views DOI Abstract
View All 27 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
60
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.