journal of maps | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1889 / 33,954
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

journal of maps

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci soc
Short Name journal of maps
Abbreviated Name journal of maps
ISSN 1744-5647
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tjom20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Land Capability for Agriculture, Hermel District, Lebanon
Abou-Najem, Sandra;Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo;Darwish, Talal;Faour, Ghaleb;Kattar, Salim;Rumbao, Inmaculada Clavero;Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael Mª;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 122-130
302 views Abstract
2020
Sustainable Development Goals: genuine global change requires genuine measures of efficacy
Smith, M.J.
Vol. 16 , pp. i-iii
260 views DOI
2020
The key role of hazard indices and hotspot in disaster risk management: the case study of Napoli and Pozzuoli municipalities (Southern Italy)
Totaro, F.
Vol. 16 , pp. 68-78
253 views DOI
2020
Geo-LiM: a new geo-lithological map for Central Europe (Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, Slovenia, and Northern Italy) as a tool for the estimation of atmospheric CO<inf>2</inf> consumption
Donnini, M.
Vol. 16 , pp. 43-55
252 views DOI
2020
Geology of the Gobi and Mongol Altai junction enhanced by gravity analysis: a key for understanding of the Mongolian Altaides
Hanžl, P.
Vol. 16 , pp. 98-107
228 views DOI
2016
perancangan sistem aplikasi terhadap penentuan tulang osteoporosis pada citra x-ray tulang paha dengan thresholding metode otsu
;Muhammad Angga Wiratama;Muhammad Reza Faisal;Radityo Adi Nugroho
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 184-196
218 views DOI Abstract
2017
sistem informasi penjualan tas berbasis web dengan pemodelan uml
;Nurul Azwanti
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
181 views DOI Abstract
2012
Health, Poverty, and Place in Accra, Ghana: Mapping Neighborhoods
Verutes GM;Fiocco MB;Weeks JR;Coulter LL;;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. -
168 views Abstract
2016
identifikasi jenis obat berdasarkan gambar logo pada kemasan menggunakan metode naive bayes
;Surya Rahayuda
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 125-134
155 views DOI Abstract
2016
penentuan anggota asrama dengan iterative dichomotiser three
;Muhammad Hasan;Muliadi Aziz;Dodon T. Nugrahadi
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 35-47
147 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.