linguistic discovery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4087 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

linguistic discovery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name linguistic discovery
Abbreviated Name linguistic discovery
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2011
evaluation of osteoporosis in hemophilic arthropathy patients: correlation with disease severity and serum trace minerals
;Eiman Mahmoud Ghaniema;Sahar Fathi Ahmed;Irene Raouf Amin;Maryse Soliman Ayoub
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
435 views DOI Abstract
2012
Phonological sketch and classification of Lawu, an undocumented Ngwi language of Yunnan
Yang, Cathryn;
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. -
307 views Abstract
2012
a 10-year experience in intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurements for primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective study of 91 previous unexplored patients
;M. C. Neves;M. N. Ohe;M. Rosano;M. Abrahão;O. Cervantes;M. Lazaretti-Castro;J. G. H. Vieira;I. S. Kunii;R. O. Santos
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
283 views DOI Abstract
2012
total parathyroidectomy with presternal intramuscular autotransplantation in renal patients: a prospective study of 66 patients
;R. O. Santos;M. N Ohe;A. B. Carvalho;M. C. Neves;I. Kunii;M. Lazaretti-Castro;M. Abrahão;O. Cervantes;J. G. H. Vieira
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
266 views DOI Abstract
2010
a radiographic study on the associations of age and prevalence of vertebral fractures with abdominal aortic calcification in japanese postmenopausal women and men
;Jun Iwamoto;Hideo Matsumoto;Tsuyoshi Takeda;Yoshihiro Sato;Mitsuyoshi Uzawa
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
2010
scientific basis for the potential use of melatonin in bone diseases: osteoporosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
;E. J. Sánchez-Barceló;M. D. Mediavilla;D. X. Tan;R. J. Reiter
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
241 views DOI Abstract
2011
the effects of parathyroid hormone applied at different regimes on the trochanteric region of the femur in ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis
;M. Tezval;A. Banhardt;S. Sehmisch;L. Kolios;U. Schmelz;K. M. Stuermer;E. K. Stuermer
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
2011
the oslo health study: a dietary index estimating frequent intake of soft drinks and rare intake of fruit and vegetables is negatively associated with bone mineral density
;Arne Torbjørn Høstmark;Anne Johanne Søgaard;Kari Alvær;Haakon E. Meyer
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
236 views DOI Abstract
2012
survivorship and severe complications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the national trauma data bank
;Amir Matityahu;Joshua Elson;Saam Morshed;Meir Marmor
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
235 views DOI Abstract
2011
protective role of black tea extract against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-induced skeletal dysfunction
;Subhra Karmakar;Sangita Majumdar;Anasuya Maiti;Monalisa Choudhury;Aniruddha Ghosh;Asankur S. Das;Chandan Mitra
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
232 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.