analytical methods | Journament

Journal Ranking

#145 / 33,809
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 8 hours ago

analytical methods

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name analytical methods
Abbreviated Name analytical methods
ISSN 17599660
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 08, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2018
therapeutic antibody-like immunoconjugates against tissue factor with the potential to treat angiogenesis-dependent as well as macrophage-associated human diseases
;Zhiwei Hu
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 8-
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Triazole-appended pyrano[2,3-: C] pyrazolone based colorimetric chemosensors for recognition of Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions and their molecular logic gate behavior
Jain H.
Vol. 11 , pp. 3230-3243
291 views DOI
2018
Improved method for spectrophotometric determination of ruthenium using 1,10-phenanthroline: Application for analysis of complex compounds
Zahirović A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 5078-5083
289 views DOI
2012
fluobodies against bioactive natural products and their application in fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay
;Seiichi Sakamoto;Benyakan Pongkitwitoon;Hiromichi Nakahara;Osamu Shibata;Yukihiro Shoyama;Hiroyuki Tanaka;Satoshi Morimoto
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 239-258
251 views DOI Abstract
2015
codon-precise, synthetic, antibody fragment libraries built using automated hexamer codon additions and validated through next generation sequencing
;Laura Frigotto;Matthew E. Smith;Christopher Brankin;Ashni Sedani;Simon E. Cooper;Nisha Kanwar;Daniel Evans;Stanislava Svobodova;Claudia Baar;Jacob Glanville;Christopher G. Ullman;Anna V. Hine
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 88-102
245 views DOI Abstract
2013
developments and challenges for mab-based therapeutics
;Satoshi Ohtake;Wei Wang;Tsutomu Arakawa;Sumit Goswami
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 452-500
241 views DOI Abstract
2019
Two RP-HPLC assay methods with different chromatographic approaches for the simultaneous estimation of bambuterol and its main degradation product, terbutaline
Walash, M.
Vol. 11 , pp. 1680-1688
236 views DOI
2020
Detection of reactive dyes from dyed fabrics after soil degradation: Via QuEChERS extraction and mass spectrometry
Sui, X.
Vol. 12 , pp. 179-187
232 views DOI
2018
Detection of bisphenol A and derivatives in human urine via cyclodextrin-promoted fluorescence modulation
Discenza, D.
Vol. 10 , pp. 3783-3790
221 views DOI
2016
A "green" method to detect aflatoxin B<inf>1</inf> residue in plant oil based on a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay
Sun, Q.
Vol. 8 , pp. 564-569
221 views DOI
View All 22 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.