Biolinguistics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5069 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Biolinguistics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name Biolinguistics
Abbreviated Name biolinguistics
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2016
auto-calibration methods of kinematic parameters and magnetometer offset for the localization of a tracked mobile robot
;Luciano Cantelli;Samuel Ligama;Giovanni Muscato;Davide Spina
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 23-
291 views DOI Abstract
2013
robotics in endometrial cancer care
;Joseph Ng
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 198-202
285 views DOI Abstract
2015
performance of very small robotic fish equipped with cmos camera
;Yang Zhao;Masaaki Fukuhara;Takahiro Usami;Yogo Takada
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 421-434
276 views DOI Abstract
2009
On Parametric (and Non-Parametric) Variation
Smith, Neil;Law, Ann;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 332-343
273 views Abstract
2014
a miniature robot for retraction tasks under vision assistance in minimally invasive surgery
;Giuseppe Tortora;Tommaso Ranzani;Iris De Falco;Paolo Dario;Arianna Menciassi
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 70-82
261 views DOI Abstract
2014
design issues and in field tests of the new sustainable tractor locostra
;Emanuela Elisa Cepolina;Michał Przybyłko;Giovanni Battista Polentes;Matteo Zoppi
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 83-105
243 views DOI Abstract
2016
state of the art robotic grippers and applications
;Kevin Tai;Abdul-Rahman El-Sayed;Mohammadali Shahriari;Mohammad Biglarbegian;Shohel Mahmud
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 11-
235 views DOI Abstract
2015
navigation of an autonomous tractor for a row-type tree plantation using a laser range finder—development of a point-to-go algorithm
;Pawin Thanpattranon;Tofael Ahamed;Tomohiro Takigawa
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 341-364
209 views DOI Abstract
2016
estimation of physical human-robot interaction using cost-effective pneumatic padding
;André Wilkening;Nikolina Puleva;Oleg Ivlev
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 17-
207 views DOI Abstract
2014
From Comparative Languistics to Comparative (Bio)linguistics: Reflections on Variation
Leivada, Evelina;
Vol. 8 , pp. 053-066
195 views
View All 13 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.