Psychonomic bulletin & review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1573 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

Psychonomic bulletin & review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Psychon Bull Rev
Abbreviated Name psychon bull rev
ISSN 1531-5320
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13423
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2016
Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning
Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
1,126 views DOI
2019
Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms.
Seyfarth, Scott;Vander Klok, Jozina;Garellek, Marc;
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
analytical predictions for the buckling of a nanoplate subjected to non-uniform compression based on the four-variable plate theory
;Mohammad Malikan
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 218-228
255 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: An integrative review.
Meade, Gabriela;
251 views DOI Abstract
2016
modified rectangular patch antenna loaded with multiple c slots for multiple applications
;Amit Jain;Monika Surana
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 192-199
251 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Bostyn, D H;De Keersmaecker, J;Van Assche, J;Roets, A;
248 views DOI Abstract
2019
Paying the meter: Effect of metrical similarity on word lengthening.
Myers, Brett R;Watson, Duane G;
240 views DOI Abstract
2020
Semantic memory: A review of methods, models, and current challenges.
Kumar, Abhilasha A;
224 views DOI Abstract
2016
bending analysis of thick isotropic plates by using 5th order shear deformation theory
;Yuwaraj M. Ghugal;Param D. Gajbhiye
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 80-95
210 views DOI Abstract
2017
thermal-hydraulics analysis of pressurized water reactor core by using single heated channel model
;Reza Akbari;Dariush Rezaei;Ahmad Gharib
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 192-198
195 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.