canadian journal of learning and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4112 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

canadian journal of learning and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name canadian journal of learning and technology
Abbreviated Name canadian journal of learning and technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2004
Developing a Holistic Approach for E-Learning Accessibility
Kelly, Brian;Phipps, Lawrie;Swift, Elaine;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. -
484 views Abstract
2009
From a social digital identity to an academic digital identity: Introducing ePortfolios in English language enhancement courses
Hiradhar, Preet;Gray, Jeremy;
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. -
478 views Abstract
2019
Le codesign d’une plateforme numérique fondé sur des principes au service de l’agentivité des enseignantes et des enseignants en contexte de développement professionnel | Co-Design of a Digital Platform Based on Principles Supporting Teachers’ Agency in the Context of Professional Development
Deschênes, Michelle;Laferrière, Thérèse;
Vol. 45 , No. 1 , pp. -
437 views Abstract
2012
Approche de Modernisation de l’Enseignement des Langues et Cultures Nationales du Cameroun à l’aide des TIC / Approach of modernization of Cameroon national cultures and languages teaching through ICT
Nkenlifack, Marcellin;Nangue, Raoul;Demsong, Bethin;Tchokomakoua, Maurice;
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. -
327 views Abstract
2015
Prevailing Lexical-stylistic Features in Emirati Language Learners’ Digital Discourse | Caractéristiques lexicales stylistiques dominantes dans le discours numérique des apprenants en langue émirienne
Grigoryan, Tsoghik;
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. -
305 views Abstract
2019
Building teaching–learning capacities of online nurse educators: Using TPACK to frame pedagogical processes and identify required supports
Kraglund-Gauthier, W.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2008
Online learning management systems (LMS) and sense of community: A pre-service practicum perspective
Rideout, Glenn;Bruinsma, Robert;Hull, John;Modayil, Jacob;
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. -
289 views Abstract
2006
Un environnement 3D qui favorise le sentiment d’appartenance en situation de formation à distance
IsaBelle, Claire;Vézina, Nancy;Fournier, Hélène;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. -
281 views Abstract
2018
An online community of practice to support the development of teaching practices in reading comprehension
Desmeules, A.
Vol. 44 , pp. 0-0
259 views DOI
2002
Creating Learning Objects to Enhance the Educational Experiences of American Sign Language Learners: An Instructional Development Report
Conceição, Simone;Lehman, Rosemary M.;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. -
258 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.