The Journal of cardiovascular nursing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1057 / 33,954
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Cardiovasc Nurs
Abbreviated Name j cardiovasc nurs
ISSN 1550-5049
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.lww.com/mcnjournal/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

Heart Rate Variability and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Non-Hispanic Black Versus Non-Hispanic White Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.
Faulkner, Melissa Spezia;Quinn, Laurie;Fritschi, Cynthia;Tripp, Natalie;Hayat, Matthew J;
Vol. 34 , No. 5 , pp. 372-379
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks and Psychological Distress: Examining the Mediating Roles of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator-Related Concerns and Perceived Control.
Lee, Kyoung Suk;Kim, Jun Hyung;Kang, Ki-Woon;Miller, Jennifer;McEvedy, Samantha M;Hwang, Seon Young;Moser, Debra K;
331 views DOI Abstract
2016
challenges faced by medellín city council in the application of public policy for social and solidarity-based economy
;Martha del Socorro Alzate Cárdenas;Olga Lucía Arboleda Álvarez;Oswaldo Antonio Salgado Cañaveral
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 401-430
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Initial Psychometric Testing of the Knowledge About Atrial Fibrillation and Self-Management Survey
McCabe, P.
Vol. 35 , pp. 35-44
238 views DOI
2014
el concepto de materialidad: implicaciones para gerentes e inversionistas
;Ahmad Hussein Juma’h
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 159-168
208 views Abstract
2016
contributions for the measurement of the impact of the training for work policy: a proposal for the assessment of the apprenticeship contract in colombia
;Juan Carlos Segura Ortiz
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 349-378
197 views DOI Abstract
2014
the development of a national brand: fundaments in positioning through non-traditional exports
;Pedro Barrientos Felipa
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 115-140
183 views Abstract
2020
A Prediction Model of Rehabilitation Motivation in Middle-Aged Survivors of Stroke in Rehabilitation Facilities in Korea.
Oh, Soo Yong;Hwang, Seon Young;Chung, Misook L;Lennie, Terry A;
180 views DOI Abstract
2017
towards a post-conflict economy
;Joan Miguel Tejedor Estupiñán
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 11-22
167 views DOI Abstract
2014
impact of the economic crisis on employment in spanish regions: analysis by sector for the years 2007-2010
;Antonio Rafael Peña Sánchez;Mercedes Jiménez García;José Ruiz Chico
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 43-71
157 views Abstract
View All 11 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.