endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2434 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name endocrinol diabetes metab case rep
Abbreviated Name endocrinol diabetes metab case rep
ISSN 2052-0573
Aim and Scope
URL https://edm.bioscientifica.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2019
Complex management decisions in a woman with concurrent primary hyperparathyroidism and metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma, both presenting during pregnancy.
Arnez, Lorena;Lawrence, Victor;
Vol. 2019
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical presentation and management of primary ovarian neuroendocrine tumor in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.
Jhawar, Sakshi;Lakhotia, Rahul;Suzuki, Mari;Welch, James;Agarwal, Sunita K;Sharretts, John;Merino, Maria;Ahlman, Mark;Blau, Jenny E;Simonds, William F;Del Rivero, Jaydira;
Vol. 2019
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Continuous glucose monitoring in the management of patients after gastric bypass
Flores, Marcela;Soto, Ruth;Velázquez, Verónica;Cortés, Reina;Salinas, Carlos;García, Eduardo;
Vol. 2019 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
294 views DOI Abstract
2014
nasty nazis and extreme americans: cloning, eugenics, and the exchange of national signifiers in contemporary science fiction
;Elizabeth Bridges
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. -
257 views DOI Abstract
2013
reviews of recent publications
;
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2012
the incertitude of language and life in the poetry of olvido garcía valdés
;Sharon Keefe Ugalde
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
1978
cyclones and vortices: alejo carpentier's reasons of state as cartesian discourse
;Joseph F. O'Neill
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2002
"what exactly is a black?": interrogating the reality of race in jean genet's the blacks
;Debby Thompson
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. -
231 views DOI Abstract
2014
complicating eroticism and the male gaze: feminism and georges bataille’s story of the eye
;Chris Vanderwees
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. -
227 views DOI Abstract
2014
fiona barclay. writing postcolonial france. haunting, literature, and the maghreb. lanham, md.: lexington books, 2011. xliv + 152 pp.
;Anna Rocca
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. -
214 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.