journal of diabetes science and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2714 / 33,951
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

journal of diabetes science and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j diabetes sci technol
Abbreviated Name j diabetes sci technol
ISSN 1932-2968
Aim and Scope
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal/journal-diabetes-science-and-technology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2019
Adaptive Control of an Artificial Pancreas Using Model Identification, Adaptive Postprandial Insulin Delivery, and Heart Rate and Accelerometry as Control Inputs.
Resalat, Navid;Hilts, Wade;Youssef, Joseph El;Tyler, Nichole;Castle, Jessica R;Jacobs, Peter G;
, pp. 1932296819881467
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Infrared Thermography and Vascular Disorders in Diabetic Feet.
Ilo, Arjaleena;Romsi, Pekka;Mäkelä, Jussi;
, pp. 1932296819871270
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
Avari, Parizad;Moscardo, Vanessa;Jugnee, Narvada;Oliver, Nick;Reddy, Monika;
, pp. 1932296819867688
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Input for Design of a Decision Support Smartphone Application for Type 1 Diabetes.
Wilson, Leah M;Tyler, Nichole;Jacobs, Peter G;Gabo, Virginia;Senf, Brian;Reddy, Ravi;Castle, Jessica R;
, pp. 1932296819870231
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cutaneous Reactions to Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
Rachel S. Rigo,Laura E. Levin,Donald V. Belsito,Maria C. Garzon,Rachelle Gandica,Kristen M. Williams;Rachel S. Rigo;Laura E. Levin;Donald V. Belsito;Maria C. Garzon;Rachelle Gandica;Kristen M. Williams;
, pp. 1-
300 views DOI
2020
Stability of Glucose Concentrations in Frozen Plasma.
Pleus, Stefan;Freckmann, Guido;Baumstark, Annette;Haug, Cornelia;
, pp. 1932296820963657
298 views DOI Abstract
2017
light technologies for nursing care in psychosocial attention: contributions to overcoming stigmas on mental disease
;Valquiria Farias Bezerra Barbosa;Cleomarcos Gomes Lima;July Polyana de Souza Simões;Robervam de Moura Pedroza;Marcelle Guimarães de Mello
Vol. 14 , No. 26 , pp. 119-132
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diabetes Care and Management Using Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review
Lessing, S.
Vol. 13 , pp. 774-782
280 views DOI
2017
activities developed to the personal empowerment of the family caregiver with aphasia
;Isabela Ecker Dresch;Suzany de Fátima Henchoste Olibone;Manuela Arceno;Deise Baixo Duarte Furtado
Vol. 14 , No. 25 , pp. 182-190
278 views DOI Abstract
2019
Digital Diabetes Congress 2019.
Han, Julia;King, Fraya;Klonoff, David;Drincic, Andjela;Crosby, Keesha Perkins;Robinson, Thomas;Gabbay, Robert A;Oley, Leslie;Ahn, David;Evans, Bill;Salber, Patricia;Cruz, Marisa;Ginsberg, Barry;Adi, Saleh;Armstrong, David;Kerr, David;
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 979-989
237 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.