Indexed in Journament

The American surgeon

ISSN 1555-9823· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.2/100
Journament Score
#9,593
Journament Rank
17
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Am Surg
Abbreviated Name am surg
ISSN 1555-9823
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-american-surgeon/journal203700

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2019
Clinically Meaningful Laboratory Protocols Reduce Hospital Charges Based on Institutional and ACS-NSQIP® Risk Calculators in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.
Vol. 85 , No. 8 , pp. 883-894
393 views Abstract
1966
Effect of DMSO on wound healing: tensile strength measurements in rabbits.
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 421-4
379 views
2019
Impact of Laparoscopy on Training: Are Open Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy on the Brink of Extinction?
Vol. 85 , No. 7 , pp. 761-763
348 views Abstract
2019
Youth and Young Adult Victims of Interpersonal Violence at LA County + USC Medical Center: A Review of Epidemiology and Recidivism.
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1166-1170
347 views Abstract
2019
Wandering Spleen with 720-degree Torsion Treated with Splenectomy and Distal Pancreatectomy.
Vol. 85 , No. 8 , pp. e430-e432
342 views
2019
THE Big Deal: An Institution's Experience with Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.
Vol. 85 , No. 9 , pp. 1061-1065
333 views Abstract
2019
Hospital Enforcement of Early Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.
Vol. 85 , No. 8 , pp. 858-860
330 views Abstract
2020
Global Impact of Social Media on Women in Surgery.
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. 152-157
319 views Abstract
2019
Debris Flow Syndrome: Injuries and Outcomes after the Montecito Debris Flow.
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1094-1098
296 views Abstract
2019
Visceral Kaposi Sarcoma Presenting as Small Bowel Intussusception: A Rare Presentation and Call to Action.
Vol. 85 , No. 7 , pp. 778-780
279 views Abstract
2024
Performance Improvement Program Review of Institutional Massive Transfusion Protocol Adherence: An Opportunity for Improvement.
Vol. 90 , No. 5 , pp. 1082-1088
17 views DOI Abstract
2024
Management of Extraperitoneal Bladder Injuries in Patients With Pelvic Fractures.
, pp. 31348241244641
42 views DOI Abstract
2024
Outcomes and Predictors of Delayed Intervention After Renal Trauma.
, pp. 31348241246164
60 views DOI Abstract
2024
Clinical Implications of Over- and Under-Triage Using Need for Trauma Intervention and Cribari Indices.
, pp. 31348241246181
89 views DOI Abstract
2020
Global Impact of Social Media on Women in Surgery.
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. 152-157
319 views Abstract
2019
Debris Flow Syndrome: Injuries and Outcomes after the Montecito Debris Flow.
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1094-1098
296 views Abstract
2019
Youth and Young Adult Victims of Interpersonal Violence at LA County + USC Medical Center: A Review of Epidemiology and Recidivism.
Vol. 85 , No. 10 , pp. 1166-1170
347 views Abstract
2019
THE Big Deal: An Institution's Experience with Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.
Vol. 85 , No. 9 , pp. 1061-1065
333 views Abstract
2019
Clinically Meaningful Laboratory Protocols Reduce Hospital Charges Based on Institutional and ACS-NSQIP® Risk Calculators in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.
Vol. 85 , No. 8 , pp. 883-894
393 views Abstract
2019
Wandering Spleen with 720-degree Torsion Treated with Splenectomy and Distal Pancreatectomy.
Vol. 85 , No. 8 , pp. e430-e432
342 views
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.