Indexed in Journament

journal of educational evaluation for health professions

ISSN 1975-5937· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.8/100
Journament Score
#505
Journament Rank
9
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j educ eval health prof
Abbreviated Name j educ eval health prof
ISSN 1975-5937
URL http://jeehp.org

Indexings

ncbi doaj

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2019
Development and evaluation of an elective course of pharmacist's roles in disaster management in France.
Vol. 16 , pp. 19
407 views DOI Abstract
2017
ethnobotanical survey of plants with toxic active constituents, grown in the municipality of cuité, paraíba, brazil
Vol. 29 , No. 04 , pp. 339-348
360 views DOI Abstract
2013
prevalence of the use of anorexigenic drugs by academics of a private institution at montes claros-mg
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 17-23
283 views DOI Abstract
2020
processo de trabalho do farmacêutico na atenção primária: revisão crítica
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 13-22
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
processo de trabalho do farmacêutico na atenção primária: revisão crítica
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 13-22
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and evaluation of an elective course of pharmacist's roles in disaster management in France.
Vol. 16 , pp. 19
407 views DOI Abstract
2017
ethnobotanical survey of plants with toxic active constituents, grown in the municipality of cuité, paraíba, brazil
Vol. 29 , No. 04 , pp. 339-348
360 views DOI Abstract
2013
prevalence of the use of anorexigenic drugs by academics of a private institution at montes claros-mg
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 17-23
283 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.