atencion primaria | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1855 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

atencion primaria

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name aten primaria
Abbreviated Name atencion primaria
ISSN 0212-6567
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/atencion-primaria
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2019
Moderate exercise and intake of either high or low glycemic index carbohydrates in sedentary women
Ortiz-Rodríguez, B.
Vol. 51 , pp. 327-332
330 views DOI
2014
from the educational to professional supervision
;Ainhoa Berasaluze Correo;Miren Ariño altuna
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 103-113
310 views DOI Abstract
2002
[Principal requirements in medical training for certification of deaths in Spain].
Cirera Suárez, L;Navarro Sánchez, C;Barber Vallés, X;Contreras Gil, J;Martínez López, C;García Rodríguez, J;
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 348-55
274 views Abstract
2013
public policies on gender mainstreaming – rescuing intersectionality, intersectoriality and interdisciplinarity in social work
;Teresa Kleba Lisboa;Simone Lolatto
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 409-419
261 views DOI Abstract
2013
las finanzas éticas como instrumento al servicio de la economía solidaria. la experiencia de coop57
;Raimon Gassiot Ballbè
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 75-84
252 views DOI Abstract
1993
vii congreso estatal de diplomados en trabajo social y asistentes sociales: "la intervención social en la europa sin fronteras" (barcelona, 3-5 de diciembre de 1992).
;Mercedes Sundheim Losada
, No. 6 , pp. -
251 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of a Physical activity program on self-esteem in subjects with chronic diseases. ‘Pas a Pas’ community intervention trial
Villalobos, F.
Vol. 51 , pp. 236-244
242 views DOI
2016
Psycho-social factors involved in amputation. Systematic review of the literature
Font-Jimenez, I.
Vol. 48 , pp. 207-210
242 views DOI
1994
una aproximación a las enfermedades profesionales del policía.
;Carmen Brufao Curiel
, No. 7 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
1999
de mary richmond a la aldea global. reflexiones sobre el papel del trabajo social ante la revolución de las tecnologías de información.
;Encarna Guillén Sádaba;Clarisa Ramos Feijoo
, No. 12 , pp. -
236 views DOI Abstract
View All 40 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.