Indexed in Journament

eurasip journal on advances in signal processing

ISSN 1687-6180· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,667 of 29,297 scored journals (34,017 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 67% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eurasip journal on advances in signal processing
Abbreviated Name eurasip journal on advances in signal processing
ISSN 1687-6180

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 37.0
Innovation 51.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 70.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 37.0 25.9
Innovation 51.0 24.1
Community Impact 12.1 5.7
Content Distribution 70.2 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2017
Canonic FFT flow graphs for real-valued even/odd symmetric inputs
Lao, Yingjie;Parhi, Keshab K.;
Vol. 2017 , No. 1 , pp. 1-23
520 views Abstract
2007
Exploiting Narrowband Efficiency for Broadband Convolutive Blind Source Separation
Robert, Aichner;Herbert, Buchner;Walter, Kellermann;
Vol. 2007 , No. 1 , pp. 016381-
482 views Abstract
2007
MAP-Based Underdetermined Blind Source Separation of Convolutive Mixtures by Hierarchical Clustering and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-6180-2007-024717-i1.gif"/></inline-formula>-Norm Minimization
Walter, Kellermann;Stefan, Winter;Hiroshi, Sawada;Shoji, Makino;
Vol. 2007 , No. 1 , pp. 024717-
476 views Abstract
2019
Optimized implementation of digital signal processing applications with gapless data acquisition
Liu, Y.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
457 views DOI
2010
Seamless Heterogeneous 3D Tessellation via DWT Domain Smoothing and Mosaicking
Gesqui&amp;#232;re, Gilles;Islam, Naveed;Puech, William;Hayat, Khizar;
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
454 views Abstract
2010
Seamless Heterogeneous 3D Tessellation via DWT Domain Smoothing and Mosaicking
William, Puech;Naveed, Islam;Gilles, Gesqui&#232;re;Khizar, Hayat;
Vol. 2010 , No. 1 , pp. 913681-
431 views Abstract
2005
Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends
Rass, U. ;Puder, H. ;Kornagel, U. ;Fischer, E. ;Eggers, J. ;Chalupper, J. ;Hamacher, V. ;
Vol. 2005 , No. 18 , pp. 2915-2929
427 views Abstract
2010
Comparing an FPGA to a Cell for an Image Processing Application
Ives, Robert W.;Broussard, Randy P.;Ngo, Hau;Rakvic, Ryan N.;
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
426 views Abstract
2007
Fixed-Point Algorithms for the Blind Separation of Arbitrary Complex-Valued Non-Gaussian Signal Mixtures
C, Douglas Scott;
Vol. 2007 , No. 1 , pp. 036525-
411 views Abstract
2010
Driver Drowsiness Warning System Using Visual Information for Both Diurnal and Nocturnal Illumination Conditions
Flores, Marco Javier;Armingol, Jos&amp;#233; Mar&amp;#237;a;Escalera, Arturo de la;
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
386 views Abstract
2019
Optimized implementation of digital signal processing applications with gapless data acquisition
Liu, Y.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
457 views DOI
2019
Stationary time-vertex signal processing
Loukas, A.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
2019
A novel fixed-point algorithm for constrained independent component analysis
Qian, G.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
282 views DOI
2018
modeling and forecasting of climatic parameters: univariate sarima versus multivariate vector autoregression approach
;MJ Hossain;AKM Abdullah Al Amin;Abu Hayat Md Saiful Islam
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 131-143
163 views DOI Abstract
2018
effect of formaldehyde on some post-harvest qualities and shelf-life of selected fruits and vegetables
;Raiya Adiba Antora;Md Pavel Hossain;Syeeda Shiraj Um Monira;Mohammad Gulzarul Aziz
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 151-157
233 views DOI Abstract
2018
historical trends and variability of temperature extremes in two climate vulnerable regions of bangladesh
;Khalid Mahmud;Susmita Saha;Tanvir Ahmad;Ummay Saima Satu
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 283-292
246 views DOI Abstract
2017
weed composition study on wheat and boro rice in research and farmers’ fields
;M Huda;M Begum;MM Rahman;F Akter
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 148-157
73 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge of farmers about animal management and prevalence of reproductive disorders in cows at babugonj upazila under barisal district of bangladesh
;AK Paul;PK Mittra;PK Sarkar;PK Howlader
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 272-275
193 views DOI Abstract
2017
screening of sesbania accessions based on early biomass yield
;Sontosh C Chanda;AKM Azad ud Doula;AKM Golam Sarwar
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 188-192
155 views DOI Abstract
2017
Canonic FFT flow graphs for real-valued even/odd symmetric inputs
Lao, Yingjie;Parhi, Keshab K.;
Vol. 2017 , No. 1 , pp. 1-23
520 views Abstract
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,667 of 29,297 scored
(34,017 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

51.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.