climate of the past | Journament

Journal Ranking

#505 / 33,980
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

climate of the past

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name climate of the past
Abbreviated Name climate of the past
ISSN 1814-9324
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.climate-of-the-past.net/index.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2016
Influence of proxy data uncertainty on data assimilation for the past climate
Matsikaris, A.;Widmann, M.;Jungclaus, J.;
Vol. 12 , No. 7 , pp. 1555-1563
462 views Abstract
2016
grain yield of maize influenced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr) and zinc under water deficit stress
;Saeid Ghanbari;Seyyed Gholamreza Moosavi
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 21-41
402 views Abstract
2014
Radiative forcings for 28 potential Archean greenhouse gases
Byrne, B.;Goldblatt, C.;
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 1779-1801
369 views Abstract
2017
assessing physiological characteristics and dry matter of two mung bean genotypes
;Rozbeh Farhoudi;Mohammad Motamedi
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 73-86
349 views Abstract
2017
evaluation of the effects of biological and chemical fertilizers on some physiological and growth characteristics of fenugreek (trigonella foenum-graecum)
;Samira Menbari;Saeideh Alizadeh Salteh;Sahebali Bolandnazar;Mohammad Reza Sarikhani
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 153-169
334 views Abstract
2017
interaction of density and management of mungbean (vigna radiata l.) on sesame (sesamum indicum l.) seed yield and weeds control
;Hannaneh Mehdipour;Rahmat Abbasi;Arastoo Abbasianh
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 37-48
317 views Abstract
2017
influence of rhizobium, pseudomonas and fungi mycorrhiza on some traits of red beans (phaseolus vulgaris l.) under drought stress
;Ebrahim Abbasi Seyahjani;Mehrdad Yarnia;Farhad Faravash;Mohammad Bagher Khorsidi Benam;Hadi Asadi Rahmani
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 85-102
316 views Abstract
2017
advantage of peppermint (mentha piperita l.) and faba bean (vicia faba l.) intercropping in different cropping patterns
;Mostafa Amani Machiani;Abdollah Javanmard;Yousef Nasiri;Mohammad reza Morshedloo
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 45-62
314 views Abstract
2017
the effects of phosphate bio-fertilizer and npk fertilizer on vegetative growth and the amount of phosphorus in potmarigold (calendula officinalis l.)
;Dana Zadeh-dabbagh;Mohammad-hossein Daneshvar;Mohammad-ebrahim Azemi;Amin Lotfi Jalal-abad
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 121-131
301 views Abstract
2010
biological control of sclerotinia sclerotiorum the causal agent of potato white mold by different trichoderma spp. and coniothyrium minitans
;SMR Ojaghian;D Zafari;G Khodakaramian
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 107-119
270 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.