Trends in Biotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#148 / 33,856
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
44
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 周前

Trends in Biotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
索引数
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
简称 Trends in Biotechnology
缩写名称 trends biotechnol
ISSN 1879-3096
宗旨与范围
URL
作者须知
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 08, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2019
Engineering Microbial Living Therapeutics: The Synthetic Biology Toolbox.
Pedrolli, Danielle B;Ribeiro, Nathan V;Squizato, Patrick N;de Jesus, Victor N;Cozetto, Daniel A;, ;
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 100-115
331 views DOI Abstract
2004
Is whole-culture synchronization biology's 'perpetual-motion machine'?
Cooper, Stephen;
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 266-9
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accelerating Climate Resilient Plant Breeding by Applying Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence.
Harfouche, Antoine L;Jacobson, Daniel A;Kainer, David;Romero, Jonathon C;Harfouche, Antoine H;Scarascia Mugnozza, Giuseppe;Moshelion, Menachem;Tuskan, Gerald A;Keurentjes, Joost J B;Altman, Arie;
287 views DOI Abstract
2013
blue jeans, chewing gum and climate change litigation: american exports to europe
;Daniel G Hare
Vol. 29 , No. 76 , pp. 65-87
280 views DOI Abstract
2015
battling for the rights to privacy and data protection in the irish courts
;Shane Darcy
Vol. 31 , No. 80 , pp. 131-136
271 views DOI Abstract
2016
the borders of eu competences with regard to the international regulation of intellectual property rights: constructing a dam to resist a river bursting its banks
;Yole Tanghe
Vol. 32 , No. 82 , pp. 27-43
254 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stacked Bt Proteins Pose No New Risks to Nontarget Arthropods.
Romeis, Jörg;Meissle, Michael;
250 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oligonucleotide Analogs and Mimics for Sensing Macromolecular Biocompounds.
Bartold, Katarzyna;Pietrzyk-Le, Agnieszka;D'Souza, Francis;Kutner, Wlodzimierz;
247 views DOI Abstract
2015
big brother’s little helpers: the right to privacy and the responsibility of internet service providers
;Yael Ronen
Vol. 31 , No. 80 , pp. 72-86
232 views DOI Abstract
2014
“bridging the gap between international investment law and the environment”, 4th and 5th november, the hague, the netherlands
;Rosalien Diepeveen;Yulia Levashova;Tineke Lambooy
Vol. 30 , No. 78 , pp. 145-160
227 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
32
15
30
50
44
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

44.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.