Indexed in Journament

Trends in Biotechnology

ISSN 1879-3096· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,817 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 76.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Trends in Biotechnology
Abbreviated Name trends biotechnol
ISSN 1879-3096
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/trends-in-biotechnology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.7 5.8
Content Distribution 59.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
Engineering Microbial Living Therapeutics: The Synthetic Biology Toolbox.
Pedrolli, Danielle B;Ribeiro, Nathan V;Squizato, Patrick N;de Jesus, Victor N;Cozetto, Daniel A;, ;
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 100-115
441 views DOI Abstract
2004
Is whole-culture synchronization biology's 'perpetual-motion machine'?
Cooper, Stephen;
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 266-9
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accelerating Climate Resilient Plant Breeding by Applying Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence.
Harfouche, Antoine L;Jacobson, Daniel A;Kainer, David;Romero, Jonathon C;Harfouche, Antoine H;Scarascia Mugnozza, Giuseppe;Moshelion, Menachem;Tuskan, Gerald A;Keurentjes, Joost J B;Altman, Arie;
393 views DOI Abstract
2013
blue jeans, chewing gum and climate change litigation: american exports to europe
;Daniel G Hare
Vol. 29 , No. 76 , pp. 65-87
376 views DOI Abstract
2015
battling for the rights to privacy and data protection in the irish courts
;Shane Darcy
Vol. 31 , No. 80 , pp. 131-136
357 views DOI Abstract
2014
“bridging the gap between international investment law and the environment”, 4th and 5th november, the hague, the netherlands
;Rosalien Diepeveen;Yulia Levashova;Tineke Lambooy
Vol. 30 , No. 78 , pp. 145-160
335 views DOI Abstract
2016
the borders of eu competences with regard to the international regulation of intellectual property rights: constructing a dam to resist a river bursting its banks
;Yole Tanghe
Vol. 32 , No. 82 , pp. 27-43
324 views DOI Abstract
2015
big brother’s little helpers: the right to privacy and the responsibility of internet service providers
;Yael Ronen
Vol. 31 , No. 80 , pp. 72-86
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stacked Bt Proteins Pose No New Risks to Nontarget Arthropods.
Romeis, Jörg;Meissle, Michael;
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oligonucleotide Analogs and Mimics for Sensing Macromolecular Biocompounds.
Bartold, Katarzyna;Pietrzyk-Le, Agnieszka;D'Souza, Francis;Kutner, Wlodzimierz;
308 views DOI Abstract
2025
The next Green Revolution: integrating crop architectype and physiotype.
Li, Xia; Xie, Chen; Cheng, Lin; Tong, Hongning; Bock, Ralph; Qian, Qian; Zhou, Wenbin
53 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthetic Biology Category Wins the 350th Anniversary Merck Innovation Cup
Matos, Â.
Vol. 38 , pp. 1-4
192 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stacked Bt Proteins Pose No New Risks to Nontarget Arthropods.
Romeis, Jörg;Meissle, Michael;
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Engineering Microbial Living Therapeutics: The Synthetic Biology Toolbox.
Pedrolli, Danielle B;Ribeiro, Nathan V;Squizato, Patrick N;de Jesus, Victor N;Cozetto, Daniel A;, ;
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 100-115
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accelerating Climate Resilient Plant Breeding by Applying Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence.
Harfouche, Antoine L;Jacobson, Daniel A;Kainer, David;Romero, Jonathon C;Harfouche, Antoine H;Scarascia Mugnozza, Giuseppe;Moshelion, Menachem;Tuskan, Gerald A;Keurentjes, Joost J B;Altman, Arie;
393 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dunaliella Microalgae for Nutritional Protein: An Undervalued Asset.
Sui, Yixing;Vlaeminck, Siegfried E;
250 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oligonucleotide Analogs and Mimics for Sensing Macromolecular Biocompounds.
Bartold, Katarzyna;Pietrzyk-Le, Agnieszka;D'Souza, Francis;Kutner, Wlodzimierz;
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
bridging scholarship and practice: 20 years of the public international law and policy group
;Brianne McGonigle Leyh;Julie Fraser
Vol. 33 , No. 84 , pp. 1-3
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
Science and Postmodernism: From Right-Thinking to Soft-Despotism.
Kuntz, Marcel;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 283-285
247 views DOI Abstract
2016
the borders of eu competences with regard to the international regulation of intellectual property rights: constructing a dam to resist a river bursting its banks
;Yole Tanghe
Vol. 32 , No. 82 , pp. 27-43
324 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,817 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.