bmc pharmacology and toxicology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5157 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

bmc pharmacology and toxicology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name bmc pharmacology and toxicology
Abbreviated Name bmc pharmacology and toxicology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2018
Effect of Linagliptin and Voglibose on metabolic profile in patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Parthan, Girish;Bhansali, Shobhit;Kurpad, Anura V.;Walia, Rama;Bhat, Kishor;Bhansali, Anil;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
492 views Abstract
2018
One-year mortality among hospital survivors of cholinesterase inhibitor poisoning based on Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2003 to 2012
Chuang, Min-Chun;Chang, Chih-Hao;Lee, Chung Shu;Li, Shih-Hong;Hsiao, Ching-Chung;Fang, Yueh-Fu;Hsieh, Meng-Jer;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
426 views Abstract
2015
meridional coma of negative anastigmatic lenses at the final position of an object
;V. A. Bezrukov;G. V. Karpova
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 362-364
382 views DOI Abstract
2018
infrared spectroscopic study of dynamics and complexation mechanism in chemosorption of ions of metals by acrylate hydrogels
;V. E. Sitnikova;M. V. Baidakova;R. O. Olekhnovich;M. V. Uspenskaya
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 614-622
337 views DOI Abstract
2018
audio-replay attacks spoofing detection for speaker recognition systems
;G. M. Lavrentyeva;S. A. Novoselov;A. V. Kozlov ;O. Y. Kydashev;V. L. Shchemelinin ;Y. N. Matveev;M. De Marsico
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 428-436
297 views DOI Abstract
2018
photo- and thermodegradation of holograms recorded in nanocomposite
;E. B. Sheklanova;I. Y. Denisyuk;A. V. Bykov
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 695-699
289 views DOI Abstract
2016
trends in the development of detonation engines for high-speed aerospace aircrafts and the problem of triple configurations of shock waves. part ii - research of counterpropagating shock waves and triple shock wave configurations
;P. V. Bulat;P. V. Denissenko
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 199-223
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
development and testing of errors correction algorithm in electronic design automation
;E. B. Romanova
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 303-310
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluation of semantic similarity for sentences in natural language by mathematical statistics methods
;A. E. Pismak;A. E. Kharitonova;E. A. Tsopa; S. V. Klimenkov
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 324-330
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
disturbance error invariance in automatic control systems for technological object trajectory movement
;A. V. Lekareva
Vol. 16 , No. 5 , pp. 787-795
197 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.