journal of the international society of sports nutrition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#119 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

journal of the international society of sports nutrition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name j int soc sports nutr
Abbreviated Name j int soc sports nutr
ISSN 1550-2783
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rssn20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2019
Comparison of ingesting a food bar containing whey protein and isomalto-oligosaccharides to carbohydrate on performance and recovery from an acute bout of resistance-exercise and sprint conditioning: an open label, randomized, counterbalanced, crossover pilot study.
Grubic, Tyler J;Sowinski, Ryan J;Nevares, Ben E;Jenkins, Victoria M;Williamson, Susannah L;Reyes, Aimee G;Rasmussen, Christopher;Greenwood, Mike;Murano, Peter S;Earnest, Conrad P;Kreider, Richard B;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 34
300 views DOI Abstract
2005
chinical diagnostic accarcy of basal cell carcinoma of the periorbital region
;S. Saryazdi;M.R. Meshkat
Vol. 15 , No. 47 , pp. -
286 views Abstract
2006
incidence of acne vulgaris in the schoolsof sari, iran during 2003-2004
;M. Golpour
Vol. 16 , No. 55 , pp. 161-165
246 views Abstract
2009
incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in non-menopausal women with breast cancer
;Shahrbanoo Keihanian;Zahra Fotokian;Fatemeh Ghaffari;Maryam Vahdani;Fatemeh Shirinkam;Mohammad Mansour Saravi
Vol. 19 , No. 70 , pp. 9-17
236 views Abstract
2019
Letter to the editor UC-II® Undenatured type II collagen: update to analytical methods.
Lugo, James P;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 29
229 views DOI Abstract
2005
antibiotic resistance of helycobacter pylori isolated from patients admitted to imam hospital, sari, iran, 2002-2003
;F. Naghshvar;H. Tirgar fakheri;Zh. Torabizadeh;O. Emadian;E. Maleki;A. Zare
Vol. 15 , No. 48 , pp. 99-104
225 views Abstract
2009
7 case reports of renal transplantation in donors with multiple renal arteries (mra) and multiple anastomosis in recipient
;Hossein Shahrokh;Mohammadali Zargar;Javad Soleymani;Kousha Kamali;Ayoub Barzgarnejad;Seyed Mohamad Reza Rabbani
Vol. 19 , No. 73 , pp. 76-79
207 views Abstract
2007
a survey of obsessive-compulsive disorder prevalence among high school girl students in sari
;A. Massoudzadeh, M.D.
Vol. 17 , No. 60 , pp. 95-101
200 views Abstract
2006
tuberculous meningitis in a 3 month old infanta case report
;M.J. Saffar;V. Ghafari Saravi
Vol. 16 , No. 54 , pp. 114-119
181 views Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.