Indexed in Journament

BMJ open diabetes research & care

ISSN 2052-4897· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.7/100
Journament Score
#6,316
Journament Rank
27
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
Abbreviated Name bmj open diabetes res care
ISSN 2052-4897
URL http://drc.bmj.com

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

effect of embryo thermal stimulation on the serum levels of immunoglobulins and corticosterone, and organ histopathology of 1 day-old broilers
Vol. 18 , No. spe2 , pp. 71-78
600 views DOI Abstract
2019
Real-world evidence of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: the TIGHT study.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000654
372 views DOI Abstract
2004
modeling energy utilization in broiler breeders, laying hens and broilers
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cost analysis of insulin degludec in comparison with insulin detemir in treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the UK.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000664
345 views DOI Abstract
addition of amylase from aspergillus awamori to the diet of broiler chickens
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 725-732
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Regular performance feedback may be key to maintain good quality DKA management: results from a five-year study.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000695
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fournier's gangrene.
Vol. 8 , No. 1
323 views DOI Abstract
2014
quality assessment of corn batches received at a feed mill in the brazilian cerrado
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 233-240
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Use of a diabetes-specific nutritional shake to replace a daily breakfast and afternoon snack improves glycemic responses assessed by continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical pilot study.
Vol. 8 , No. 1
243 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interaction between sex and rurality on the prevalence of diabetes in Guyana: a nationally representative study.
Vol. 8 , No. 1
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fournier's gangrene.
Vol. 8 , No. 1
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cost analysis of insulin degludec in comparison with insulin detemir in treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the UK.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000664
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Regular performance feedback may be key to maintain good quality DKA management: results from a five-year study.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000695
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Real-world evidence of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: the TIGHT study.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000654
372 views DOI Abstract
2015
exposure to carbonic gas enriched atmosphere or electrical water bath to stun or kill chickens
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 341-346
193 views DOI Abstract
2014
quality assessment of corn batches received at a feed mill in the brazilian cerrado
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 233-240
313 views DOI Abstract
2013
quality assessment of marketed eggs in bassekabylie (algeria)
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 395-399
272 views DOI Abstract
2013
salmonella enteritidis in the eggs of japanese quails (coturnix coturnix japonica - temminck & schlegel, 1849) fed diets with different calcium and phosphorus levels
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 27-30
249 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.