BMJ open diabetes research & care | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2456 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

BMJ open diabetes research & care

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
Abbreviated Name bmj open diabetes res care
ISSN 2052-4897
Aim and Scope
URL http://drc.bmj.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

effect of embryo thermal stimulation on the serum levels of immunoglobulins and corticosterone, and organ histopathology of 1 day-old broilers
;F Flores;IA Nääs;RG Garcia;WMQ Quinteiro;LI Souza
Vol. 18 , No. spe2 , pp. 71-78
576 views DOI Abstract
effects of kluyveromyces marxianus isolated from tibetan mushrooms on the plasma lipids, egg cholesterol level, egg quality and intestinal health of laying hens
;S Zhong;H Liu;H Zhang;T Han;H Jia;Y Xie
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 261-268
477 views DOI Abstract
effects of nutrient density and exogenous enzymesin starter diet on performance, intestinal microflora, gut morphology and immune response of broiler chickens
;A Nabizadeh;A Golian;A Hassanabadi;S Zerehdaran
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 509-518
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Real-world evidence of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: the TIGHT study.
Borgharkar, Surendra S;Das, Soma S;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000654
354 views DOI Abstract
2004
modeling energy utilization in broiler breeders, laying hens and broilers
;NK Sakomura
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Regular performance feedback may be key to maintain good quality DKA management: results from a five-year study.
Kempegowda, Punith;Chandan, Joht Singh;Coombs, Benjamin;De Bray, Anne;Jawahar, Nitish;James, Sunil;Ghosh, Sandip;Narendran, Parth;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000695
318 views DOI Abstract
addition of amylase from aspergillus awamori to the diet of broiler chickens
;HS Morgado;CSS Cysneiros;CM Sousa;JH Stringhini;CJ Ulhoa;AS Silva;R Fabino Neto;PVDX Freitas;HP Oliveira;LHC Batista
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 725-732
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cost analysis of insulin degludec in comparison with insulin detemir in treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the UK.
Thalange, Nandu;Gundgaard, Jens;Parekh, Witesh;Tutkunkardas, Deniz;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e000664
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fournier's gangrene.
Yang, Jeff Yufeng;Wang, Tiansheng;Pate, Virginia;Buse, John B;Stürmer, Til;
Vol. 8 , No. 1
307 views DOI Abstract
2014
quality assessment of corn batches received at a feed mill in the brazilian cerrado
;SIFC Rodrigues;JH Stringhini;AML Ribeiro;GC Pontalti;CM McManus
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 233-240
299 views DOI Abstract
View All 27 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.